Category: Tax Laws

Archive for the ‘Tax Laws’ Category


Narasus Coffee Company v. JCIT (2019) 104 CCH 0728 / (2020)421 ITR 445 (Mad)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Export business- No proper bifurcation of direct and indirect cost -Revision is held to be valid [ S.80HHC , 260A ]

Mobis India Ltd v. Dy. CIT, LTU-II (2018) 101 CCH 0475 /(2020)421 ITR 463 (Mad)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment -Audit objection – Depreciation- -Business or commercial rights of similar nature – Notice of reassessment based solely on audit objection is held to be not valid. [ S. 32 , 148 ]

RDS Project Ltd. v .ACIT (2020) 421 ITR 624 / 185 DTR 180/ 312 CTR 345 / 269 Taxman 327 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Cash credits – Share premium – Accommodation entries- Subsequent discovery that the transaction was with a name Lender — Notice of reassessment is held to be valid. [ S.68 148 ]

PCIT v. Swaraj Engines Ltd. (2020) 421 ITR 594 /107 CCH 0443/190 DTR 385/ 315 CTR 331 (P&H)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment — With in four years – Industrial undertaking – Change of opinion -Issue discussed in original assessment proceedings and disallowed portion of the claim – Reassessment is not valid [ S .80IA , 143(3) , 148 , 263 ]

Hitachi Hi Rel Power Electronics P. Ltd. v ACIT ( 2019) 106 CCH 0421 / (2020)421 ITR 574 (Guj) (HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years- Share premium- No failure to disclose material facts- Reassessment notice on mere surmise that the assessee had received amounts as share premium is held to be not valid .[ S.148 ]

Jayesh S. Mehta v .Dy. CIT (2020)421 ITR 353 /313 CTR 721 / 273 Taxman 469(Karn)(HC)

S.143(3): Assessment – Estimation of rate of gross profit- Direction of the Tribunal – AO has followed the direction of Appellate Tribunal – Addition made by the AO is held to be valid . [ S.132 , 158BC, 254(1) ]

Torry Harris Sea Foods P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2019) 104 CCH 0729 /(2020)421 ITR 555 / 193 DTR 377/ 316 CTR 656(Ker) (HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – Comparable uncontrolled price method- The arm’s length price determined was not in excess of the invoice price by more than 5 per cent. The price fixed by the Transfer Pricing Officer was justified . [ S. 92A, 92B ]

PCIT v. Equant Solutions India Pvt. Ltd (2019) 106 CCH 0722 / (2020)421 ITR 655 (P&H)(HC) PCIT v .Orange Business Services India Solutions Pvt. Ltd (2020)421 ITR 655 (P&H)(HC) Orange Business Services India Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)421 ITR 655 (P&H)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price -Selection of comparables —Exclusion of dissimilarities of function is held to be justified- Appellate Tribunal- Additional evidence -Tribunal directed to examine issue of asessee’s involvement in activity of software development considering additional evidence produced .[ S.254(1)

Swabhimani Souharda Credit Co-Operative Ltd v. GOI (2020)421 ITR 670 / 107 CCH 0442 (Karn) (HC) Karnataka State Souharda Federal Co-Operative Limited v. GOI (2020)421 ITR 670 (Karn) (HC)

S. 80P : Co-operative societies – Entitle to deduction – Reassessment notice is held to be not valid . [ S.2(19) , 147, 148, Constitution of India , Art , 226 , Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959, S. 2(D-2) ]

CIT (LTU) v. Reliance Industries Ltd. (2019) 104 CCH 0730 / (2020) 421 ITR 686 (Bom) (HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd. [2019] 418 ITR 13 (st) (SC)

S. 80IA :Industrial undertakings – Generation of Power- Captive Consumption — Valuation of profits to be taken at rate distribution companies allowed to supply electricity to consumers.