Category: Tax Laws

Archive for the ‘Tax Laws’ Category


ACIT v. Chambal Fertilisers And Chemicals Limited. (2018) 61 ITR 33 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure -Donation to trust was held to be allowable as deduction.

ACIT v. Chambal Fertilisers And Chemicals Limited. (2018) 61 ITR 33 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure -Club expenses of employees was held to be allowable as business expenditure .

G. Chella Krishna v. (2018) 168 ITD 117 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure – When income is assessed as from profits of business, then expenses incurred by assessee for purpose of earning such income is allowable.

ACIT v. Vishnu Packaging. (2018) 168 ITD 103/191 TTJ 468 / 161 DTR 201 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure –Goods destroyed by order of Court order in terms of provisions of prevention of Food Adulteration Act cannot be allowable as business expenditure in view of Explanation to S. 37(1) [ Prevention of Food Adulteration Act , 1954 ]

DCIT v. Narayani Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 371 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure -Freight expenses cannot be disallowed on the ground that no subsidiary ledger was maintained .

DCIT v. Narayani Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 371 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – Interest for delay in making payment of Service tax and Tax deducted at source being compensatory in nature and not penalty in nature was held to be allowable deduction.

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 61 ITR 585 (Ctk) (Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure —Subscriptions in the nature of annual membership was held to be allowable .

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 61 ITR 585 (Ctk) (Trib)

S. 37(1):Business expenditure — Capital or revenue -Development expenditure — Depreciation was held to be allowable at 10% and balance was held to be disallowable [ S. 32 ]

DCIT v. Vantage Advertising P. LTD. (2018) 61 ITR 564 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure — Advertising company — Purchase of Angles and channels was held to be allowable as deduction .

DCIT v. Associated Pigments Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 553 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure — Commission crystallised relevant year , therefore allowable as deduction