Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ankit Kapoor v. ITO ( 2021 ) 205 DTR 21/ 322 CTR 208/ ( 2022) 440 ITR 386 ( Delhi ) (HC)

S. 254(2)): Appellate Tribunal – Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Duties – High Court directed the Appellate Tribunal to upload the daily order sheets and revised cause list on its website – System in this regard be put in place by the ITAT , if not already there as expeditiously as possible , preferable within three months [ S. 253 , 254(1), 255 , , ITAT Rules ,1963 19, 20Art . 226 ]

PCIT v. Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 433 ITR 82/ 199 DTR 345/ 320 CTR 381 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : Order of Tribunal in PCIT v. Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt. Ltd (2019) 180 DTR 65/ 200 TTJ 459 / 177 ITD 809 (Delhi)(Trib.),affirmed .

S. 56 : Income from other sources – DCF Method – Receipt of consideration for issue of shares in excess of their market value – Valuation of shares- Following the prescribed method – Addition based on estimate is held to be not justified – Deletion of addition is held to be justified [ S.56 (2)(viib ) , 68, R 11UA (2)(b) ]

PCIT v. Sahara India Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (2021) 432 ITR 84 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Notice-Not mentioning the specific charge for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified.

Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 432 ITR 622/ 281 Taxman 532 / 207 DTR 54/ 323 CTR 429 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Fringe Benefits Tax-Claim for refund based on order of Tribunal-Commissioner bound by circular-Limitation does not apply to CBDT for passing order u/s 119-Principle of fairness and reasonableness is constitutional mandate-CBDT is directed to entertain the application for grant of refund. [S. 115WD(4), 119,Art, 14, 164]

PCIT v. Zuari Maroc Phosphates Ltd. (2021) 432 ITR 316 / 279 Taxman 333 (Goa) (Bom.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business expenditure-Carry forward of loss-Acceptance of claim Of without application of mind to material on record-Revision of order setting aside the Assessment order is held to be justified. [S. 37(1), 72]

Karnataka Financial Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 432 ITR 187 (Karn.) (HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Remand to Tribunal by High Court-Block assessment-Limitation-Question of limitation can be raised before the Tribunal in remand proceedings-Matter remanded to the Tribunal. [S. 132, 158BC, 254(1)]

Pradeep Kumar Jindal v. PCIT (2021) 432 ITR 48 / 200 DTR 141 / 320 CTR 326 / 279 Taxman 14 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Duty of Tribunal to decide on merits-Dismissal of first application for restoration was dismissed for non-prosecution-Dismissal of second application by invoking amendment-Dismissal was held to be not Valid-Appeal restored to original position [ITATR,1963, 24, Art. 226]

Tatia Sky Line and Health Farms Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 432 ITR 123 / 279 Taxman 18 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Power to remand must be exercised judicially-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 260A]

Rabindra Kumar Mohanty v. Registrar, ITAT (2021) 432 ITR 158 / 208 DTR 35/ 323 CTR 592 (Ori.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-No power to dismiss on ground of non-prosecution-Duty to dispose appeal on merits-Tribunal was directed to restore the appeal and decide on merit. [S. 253, ITAR, 1963, R 24, Art. 265]

Daryapur Shetkari Sahakari Ginning and Pressing Factory v. ACIT (2021) 432 ITR 130 / 198 DTR 125 / 319 CTR 70 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-No power to dismiss on ground of non-prosecution-Duty to dispose appeal on merits. [S. 253, ITAR 1963, R. 24]