S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Principle of consistency- No change in the nature of activities – Denial of exemption is not justified- Once the activities of the assessee-society were charitable, the principle of mutuality became superfluous. [ S. 2(15), 12, 12A, 13 ]

S. 10A : Free trade zone- Deduction of profits of business of eligible undertaking to be made independently before giving effect to provisions for set off and carry forward. [ S.10B ,70, 72, 74 ]

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Approval from prescribed authority mandatory —Not entitled to exemption [ S. 10 (23C)(v)]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment –Failure to file form No 29B -Return filed on the advice of Chartered Accountant – Levy of penalty is held to be not justified .[ S.115JB ]

S. 245I : Settlement Commission – Order – Conclusive -Income decalred was more than 100 times of returned income – Petition was accepted – Writ petition was filed by the recenue for reopeing of the order passed – Dismissing the petition the Court held that as a policy matter, Revenue is not to prolong litigations but bring finality, particularly when amount of Revenue involved is not more than two crores [S.245D(4), Art ,226 ]

S. 245D : Settlement Commission -Failure of revenue to communicate ex-parte order of stay – Order passed by the Settlement Commission admitting the petition Directed to pass final order with in – Writ petition of revenue was dismissed. [ S.245AB , 245C ,245D(2C() Art , 226 ]

S. 245D : Settlement Commission –Limitation Application filed by the assessee is barred by limitation – Writ petition dismissed .[ S.245D(4), 245D(6B), Art, 226 ]

S. 226 : Collection and recovery – Stay -Penalty demand – Collected more than 20% of penalty in dispute – Revenue is directed to refund the excess of 20% collected by the revenue [ Art .226 ]

S. 201 : Deduction at source – Failure to deduct or pay – Covid -19 – Notices withdrawn – Proceedings dropped [ S. 201(1)(IA), Art , 226 ]

S. 158BE : Block assessment – Time limit – Prohibitory order -Last panchanama- Prohibitory order does not extend the limitation – Order of Tribunal is affirmed . [ S.132 , 158BC ]