Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT v. Kapil Dev (2020) 119 taxmann.com 290 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, as withdrawn due to low tax effect. CIT v. Kapil Dev (2020) 274 Taxman 222(SC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 950 days-Defects not removed-Mistake of earlier standing counsel of Department-Appeal was dismissed.

CIT v. Shirin Kamaljit Singh (Smt.) (2020)115 taxmann.com 242 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect, CIT v. Shirin Kamaljit Singh (Smt.) (2020) 272 Taxman 528 (SC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 875 days-Appeal was dismissed as there was no reasonable cause.

PCIT v. Kuantum Paper Ltd. (2020) 117 taxmann.com 141 (Punj. & Har)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Kuantum Paper Ltd.(2020) 272 Taxman 532 (SC) / 273 Taxman 449 (SC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Situs of the Assessing Officer has to be seen to consider which High Court exercise territorial jurisdiction of such an officer. [S. 127]

PCIT v. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd (2020) 114 taxmann.com 617 (P & H) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is granted PCIT v. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd (2020) 269 Taxman 575 (SC)

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Stay order does not vacate after expiry of a period of 365 days if delay in disposal of appeal is not attributed to assessee-Order of Tribunal is affirmed [S.260A]

CIT v. MSD Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 136 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, CIT v. MSD Pharmaceuticals (P.) Ltd (2020) 269 Taxman 48 (SC)

S. 254(2A): Appellate Tribunal-Stay-During pendency of appeal stay of recovery proceedings is held to be justified. [S. 253]

PCIT v. Bank of India [2020] 114 taxmann.com 188 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue, PCIT v. Bank of India (2020) 270 Taxman 89 (SC)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Self assessment tax-Entitle to interest on refund. [S. 156, 244(1)(b)]

CIT(IT) v. Andritz AG (2020) 113 taxmann.com 407 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue, CIT (IT) v. Andritz AG (2020) 269 Taxman 205 (SC)

S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax-Non-Resident-It was obligation of payer to deduct entire tax at source and, assessee was not liable to pay any advance tax and, thus, interest cannot be charged.

Karmvir Builders v. PCIT (2020) 113 taxmann.com 138 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed, Karmvir Builders v. PCIT (2020) 269 Taxman 45 (SC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of appeal-Direction to deposit 15 % of tax in dispute-Held to be proper. [Art. 226]

CIT v. UTV News Ltd. (2020) 117 taxmann.com 137 (Bom.)(HC) CIT v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd (2020) 117 taxmann.com 131 (Bom.)(HC) CIT v. Zoom Entertainment Network Ltd. (2020) 117 taxmann.com 111 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect, CIT v. UTV News Ltd. (2020) 272 Taxman 114 (SC),CIT v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. (2020) 272 Taxman 116 (SC), CIT v. Zoom Entertainment Network Ltd. (2020) 272 Taxman 101 (SC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source-Contractors-Cable operator /MSO/DTH operators-Payment is covered under section 194C and not under section 194J. [S. 194J, 201 (1A)

CIT v. Bagga Distilleries Hyderabad (P.) Ltd. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 602 (AP&T) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, CIT v. Bagga Distilleries Hyderabad (P.) Ltd. (2020) 270 Taxman 93 (SC)

S. 158BFA : Block assessment-Penalty-Addition to undisclosed income on estimate basis-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 158BC, 158BFA(2), 158BGA(2), 271(1)(c)]