S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Claim of set off of non speculative business loss against the profit of speculated business-Revision order is quashed. [passed by the PCIT u/s. 263 of the Act is quashed. [S. 28 (i), 72, 73]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-When valid and lawful agreement is entered by the parties prior to 1 April 2014 but the property was registered after said date, provisions of the amended section 56(2)(vii)(b) would be inoperative and therefore an assessment order passed after due consideration of all facts but without invoking the provisions of the amended section 56(2)(vii)(b) cannot be said to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Bogus accommodation entries-Revision on the basis of roving enquiries-CBDT circular on no set-off of loss against deemed income u/s 115BBE applicable w.e.f. 1st April 2017-Invocation of section 263 jurisdiction by the Ld. CIT is invalid-Income assessed remains same even pursuant to revision-Revision is not valid. [S. 56, 68, 115BBE, 143(3)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to Revenue-AO failure to verify the genuineness of the lenders-Complete details not submitted by the assessee-Revision justified. [S. 133(6), 143(3), 147, 148]

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Monetary limits-Circular specifying monetary limits for the department is retrospective in nature-the circular applies to already pending as well as new appeals. [S. 253(4)]

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-New issue which was not considered by AO during the course of assessment-Enhancement is not valid. [S. 94(7), 251(1)(a)]

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Ex parte order-Order id set aside.

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Pathological testing services-Commission or discount to sample collection centres-No obligation to deduct tax at source-Cannot be treated as assessee in default. [S. 194H]

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-The date of the original order is the commencing point of limitation, irrelevant to the subsequent rectification or subsequent application. Hence, the order passed beyond 31.03.2015 is barred by limitation. [S. 143(1), 154(7)]

S. 153D : Assessment-Search-Approval-Order passed by AO without due approval from supervisory authority-Order was quashed. [S. 142(1), 153A]