Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Shivnarayan Nemani Shares & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 192 ITD 50 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 194J : Deduction at source-Fees for professional or technical services-Transaction charges-TDS is deductible under section 194I and not under section 194J [S. 194I]

Santosh (Smt.) v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 189 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Service of notice-Information through RTI-Generalistic notice issued without mentioning full and correct address of assessee would not be a valid notice for reopening of assessment-Matter remanded to the file of CIT(A). [S. 147]

Bindra Warehousing Corporation v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 15 (SMC) (Jabalpur)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Alleged non conduct of Audit-Reassessment notice is not valid. [S 44AB, 80IB(11A), 133(6), 148]

Krishna Mohan Choursiya v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 214 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-No adverse findings by the Chartered Accountant who has audited books of account-Estimation of net profit is not justified.

Jaico Automobile Engineering Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 192 ITD 147 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Scrap sale-Estimation of profit-Survey-Not able to reconcile-Addition is held to be justified. [S.133A]

Astro Offshore Pte. Ltd. v. DCIT(IT) (2022) 192 ITD 675 / 215 TTJ 1 / 209 DTR 26 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Period of limitation has to be strictly followed-Order passed beyond period of limitation prescribed under section 144C(4)(b) of the Act is declared invalid. [S. 144C(4)(b)]

Lam Research (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 192 ITD 449 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Condonation of delay-DRP does not have power to condone delay in filing objections by assessee before Panel.

ITO v. Keshava Nanda Kakati (2022) 192 ITD 445 (Gauhati) (Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Protective assessment-Income from other sources-No substantive addition was made in the other party-Addition was deleted. [S. 56]

Jaya Prakash v. ITO (2022) 192 ITD 316 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-No direction of Appellate Tribunal to do fresh assessment-Passing remark by the Appellate Tribunal cannot be considered as observation of the Appellate Tribunal. [S. 254(1)]

Anderson Printing House (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 192 ITD 548 (SMC) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 120 : Jurisdiction of income-tax authorities-Returned income less than of 30 lakhs-Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer-Assessment made by the Assistant Commissioner is without jurisdiction-Bad in law. [S. 127(1), 143(2), 143(3)]