Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


SCAHygiene Products AB v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2021) 187 ITD 419/ 209 TTJ 545 / 123 taxmann.com 152/ 85 ITR 607/197 DTR 401 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 4: Charge of income-tax – Reimbursement of Software payments – Licence obtained from third parties –Not royalty – Not taxable [ S.9(1)(vii)]

Ntt Data Global Delivery Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 123 taxmann.com 226/ 277 Taxman 143 (Karn) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Free trade zone – Grounds not adjudicated on merits – Matter remanded [S. 10A , 260A ]

Sri Venkkaliamman Educational and Charitable Trust .v. DCIT (2020) 122 taxmann.com 81 / (2021) 277 Taxman 257 (Mad) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Property held for charitable purposes – Purchase of gold bullion – Tribunal has not dealt with the contention of assessee- Matter remanded to Tribunal[ S. 11,m13 (1)(d) (iia) ]

Karti P. Chidambaram v. Dy. DIT (Inv) (2021) 431 ITR 261/ 197 DTR 33 / 318 CTR 113 / 122 taxmann.com 146 (Mad) (HC) Srinidhi Karti Chidambaram( Smt.) . v. Dy. DIT (Inv) (2021) 431 ITR 261 / 197 DTR 33 / 318 CTR 113 / 122 taxmann.com 146 (Mad)(HC).Editorial: Notice issued in SLP filed by Revenue , DCIT v. Karti P. Chidambaram. (2022) 289 Taxman 294 (SC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions – Wilful attempt to evade tax – False statement – Verification – Abetment – Only the concerned AO can file a complaint against the accused unless some strong incriminating material is found in the course of search/survey on a third party- Complaint filed by Director of Income-Tax — not justified — Prosecution not valid [S. 133A,136,277,278 ,279, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , S.195, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 , S.65B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 , S.193 ,196 ]

CIT v. Neena Krishna Menon (2021) 123 taxmann.com 205 / 277 Taxman 211 (Karn) (HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Capital gains not chargeable – Investment in Bonds – Amendment to S. 54EC from 1-4-2015 restricting investment in assets from sale consideration on sale of original asset to Rs. 50 lakhs prospective nature- Revision is held to be bad in law . [S.45 , 54EC ]

HL Malhotra & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 431 ITR 148/ 278 Taxman 239 /125 taxmann.com 70 / 203 DTR 192/ 321 257(Delhi)(HC)HL Malhotra & Co. (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 431 ITR 148/125 taxmann.com 70 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Adducing additional evidence – assessee filed additional evidence – Tribunal passed order without dealing with application to file additional evidence – order set aside – Matter remanded – Tribunal directed to first dispose the application for additional evidence and then pass order on merits for the appeal.[S.260A, ITAT R. 29 ]

Karnataka State Beverages Corporation Ltd .v. ACIT (2020) 121 taxmann.com 89 / (2021) 277 Taxman 58 (Karn) (HC)

S. 251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Powers – Doctrine of merger – CIT(A) dismissed appeal as being infructuous basis notice issued u/s 263 by CIT on grounds unrelated to that before CIT(A) – CIT(A) ought to have adjudicated appeal on merits hence matter remanded back to CIT(A).[ S.263 ]

CIT v. A.A. Antony (2021) 431 ITR 207/ 197 DTR 425 / 318 CTR 691 / 125 taxmann.com 170 / 278 Taxman 256(Mad) (HC)/CIT v. Ravi Prabakar ( 2021 ) 431 ITR 207/ 197 DTR 425 / 318 CTR 691 / 125 taxmann.com 170/ 278 Taxman 256 (Mad) (HC)/PCIT v. Srinivasan. K.G. (2021) 431 ITR 207/ 197 DTR 425 / 318 CTR 691 / 125 taxmann.com 170/ 278 Taxman 256 (Mad) (HC)

S. 249: Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Form of appeal and limitation – Appeal could not be dismissed on a technical ground of not filing the same electronically.[ S.251 ]

CIT.v. Corporation Bank (2021) 123 taxmann.com 204/ 277 Taxmann.com 207 (Karn) (HC)

S. 194H: : Deduction at source – Commission or brokerage –
Nationalized Bank – Service charges paid for routing transactions to National Financial Switch and Cash Tree- Not be liable to deduct tax at source .[S.40(a)(ia)]

PCIT v. Goa State Co-operative Bank Ltd (2021) 318 CTR 497 / 197 DTR 305 / 110 CCH 54 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 194A : Deduction at source – Interest other than interest on securities – No liability to deduct tax based on the specific exclusion provided to the assessee under section 194A(3)(v) – Provisions would not apply [S. 40(a)(ia), 194A(3)(i)(b) , 194A(3)(v)]