Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Nataraju (HUF) v. PCIT (2021) 323 CTR 480 / 207 DTR 249 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge in Nataraju (HUF) v. PCIT (2018) 406 ITR 342 / 254 Taxman 357 / 304 CTR 665/ 167 DTR 100 (Karn) (HC), seta side.

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Option of the assessee either to file an appeal or to file a revision-Sale of agricultural land-Capital gains-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to decide in accordance with law. [S. 2(14)(ii), 2(47), 48, 246A, Art, 226]

Xchanging Technology Services India (P) Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 323 CTR 918 / 207 DTR 429 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Reasoned order-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 110-O, Art. 10(2), Art. 226]

CMJ Breweries (P) Ltd v. UOI (2021) 283 Taxman 226 (Gauhati)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Prima facie satisfaction was not arrived by the Commissioner-Interim order-Matter was adjourned to 26-8 2021. [Art. 226]

PCIT v. Apollo Tyres Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 388 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Dispute resolution panel-Draft assessment order-No notice of demand attached-Order cannot be revised-No loss to revenue. [S. 144C]

CIT, LTU v. Vijaya Bank (2021) 131 taxmann.com 136 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue, CIT, LTU v. Vijaya Bank (2021) 283 Taxman 295 (SC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Merger-Subject matter of appeal-Investments written off-Book profit-Issue was not subject matter of appeal-Revision was quashed. [S. 115JB]

CIT v. Indian Overseas Bank (2021) 207 DTR 202/(2022)441 ITR 689 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limitation-Reassessment-Issue which was not subject matter of reassessment limitation has to be computed from the original assessment-Revision was held to be barred by limitation. [S. 143(3), 147, 263(2)]

PCIT v. Sursh Kumar Gupta (2021) 207 DTR 307 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Sanction-Issue which was not raised before the Appellate Tribunal or CIT(A) cannot be raised first time before the High Court-Appeal of the revenue is dismissed. [S. 143(1), 147,147, 151]

PCIT v. Dileep Kumar (2021) 323 CTR 998 / 208 DTR 110 (All.)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Territorial jurisdiction of High Court-Transfer of case-Pendency of proceedings-Ahmadabad Tribunal decided the appeal-Appeal was filed at Allahabad High Court-Jurisdiction vest with Gujarat High court-Appeal was dismissed. [S. 120, 127(2)]

PCIT v. Dileep Kumar (2021) 323 CTR 998 / 208 DTR 110 (All.)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Territorial jurisdiction of High Court-Transfer of case-Pendency of proceedings-Ahmadabad Tribunal decided the appeal-Appeal was filed at Allahabad High Court-Jurisdiction vest with Gujarat High court-Appeal was dismissed. [S. 120, 127(2)]

Philips India Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 323 CTR 992 / 208 DTR 211 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-lease rent-Tribunal followed order of earlier year and not followed the Judgement of Supreme Court-Miscellaneous application was dismissed-Order rejecting miscellaneous application was set aside-Non-consideration of judgement of Supreme Court is a mistake apparent on record-Matter remanded to Tribunal to decide on merits in accordance with law. [S. 37 (1), 200A]