Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Apoorva Dadha v. TRO (2021) 436 ITR 225 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 281 : Certain transfers to be void-Recovery of tax-Family settlement-Pendency of proceedings-Transfer of property is void-Order of attachment is held to be valid. [S. 158BD, 226(3), Art. 226]

CIT v. T. Jayachandran (2021) 436 ITR 269/ 283 Taxman 435 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Furnishing inaccurate particulars of income-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified.

MSPL Limited v. PCIT (2021) 436 ITR 199 / 202 DTR 117 / 321 CTR 1 (Bom.)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed , PCIT v. MSPL Ltd. (2023) 454 ITR 280 /294 Taxman 74 /332 CTR 606 (SC)

S. 255 : Appellate Tribunal-Powers of Tribunal-Tribunal cannot transfer case from Bench falling within jurisdiction of a particular High Court to Bench under jurisdiction of different High Court. [S. 254(1), ITATR, 1963, R. 4., Art. 226]

State Bank of India v. JCIT (2021) 436 ITR 653 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Provisions for transitional liability on leave fare concession/Home travel concession, silver jubilee awards to employees and on resettlement Expenses-Submissions not considered-Matter remanded to Tribunal. [S. 36, 37(1), 253]

Thaniyam Panchayath Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 436 ITR 266 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Stay of demand-20 % of demand was not paid-Court directed to defer the recovery of demand till disposal of the appeal. [S.80P, 226]

Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 436 ITR 40 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Pendency of appeal-Recovery of tax-Direction was issued to expedite the disposal of appeal and restraint against recovery of demand until disposal of appeal. [S. 143(3), 144B, 156, 226, Art. 226]

Centrient Pharmaceuticals Netherlands, B. V., IN RE (2021) 436 ITR 54 / 319 CTR 672 (AAR)

S. 245R : Advance rulings-Procedure-Application-Notice-Questions raised in application are not pending before Income-Tax Authority-Issue of notice is not bar to application for this year-Application was admitted. [S. 142 (1) 143 (2)

Karti P. Chidambaram v. PDIT (Inv.) (2021) 436 ITR 340 / 204 DTR 18 / 321 CTR 273 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search- Satisfaction note issued by the Assessing Officer-Notice under section 153C is held to be valid. [S. 132, 147, 148, 153A, Art. 226]

6th Sense Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. PDIT (2021) 436 ITR 90 / 203 DTR 177/ (2023) 334 CTR 172 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Service of notice-Notice without recording satisfaction is held to be not valid-Subsequent notice after valid satisfaction is held to be valid-High court can find out whether proper satisfaction is recorded or not, however cannot consider sufficiency of reasons [S. 132, 282, 282A Rule, 127, 127A, Art. 226]

India Awake For Transparency v. Chairman, CCBDT (No. 2) (2021) 436 ITR 512 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : Decision in Single judge in India Awake For Transparency v. Chairman, CCBDT (No. 1) (2021)436 ITR 442 (Karn) (HC) affirmed.

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Public Interest Litigation-Allegation of evasion of tax-Filing different petitions on same subject matter-Practice deprecated-Income-Tax Informants Reward Scheme, 2018. [Art. 226]