Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT LTU v. Canara Bank (2021) 276 Taxman 280/197 DTR 219/ 318 CTR 80 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Banking company-lapsed demand drafts, gift cheques etc-General Reserve-Write back allowed as business loss-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 28(i)]

CIT v. Enercon India Ltd. (2021) 276 Taxman 88 (SC)

S. 261 : Appeal-Supreme Court-Decision of Jurisdictional High Court is binding though the SLP is pending before Supreme Court-Low tax effect-SLP filed by the revenue is dismissed as withdrawn due to low tax effect. [S. 14A, R.8D]

CIT v. Mukhtar Minerals (P.) Ltd. ( 2020) 195 DTR 393/ (2021) 432 ITR 152/ 321 CTR 30/ 276 Taxman 218 (GOA) (Bom.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Revised return-Remanded to the Assessing Officer to assessee the original return. [S. 139(5)]

UFX Ventures (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 276 Taxman 448 / 198 DTR 500 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Condonation of delay of 317 days-Delay was condoned and CIT(A) is directed to hear the appeal on merits. [S. 250]

CIT v. ITSC (2021) 276 Taxman 124 (Patna)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-After a period of one year from settlement, revenue could not be allowed to raise said technical plea, as with mere change of Revenue Officer, opinion cannot be allowed to change. [S. 245C, 245D(4), Art.226]

Blue Lines v. ACIT (2021)431 ITR 144/ 276 Taxman 388/ 199 DTR 277/319 CTR 661 (Karn.)HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Cash seized-Failure to produce material-Addition is held to be justified. [S. 132]

PCIT v. Rameshbhai Jivraj Desai (2021) 276 Taxman 154 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-No incriminating material was found- Assessment attained finality-Completed assessment could not be disturbed. [S. 132, 143(1), 143(3)]

Suvendra Kumar Panda v. ITO (2021) 276 Taxman 171 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Principal officer-Director for short period-Assessee cannot be held to be Principal Officer-Notice was set aside. [S. 2(35), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Bharathi Constructions (2021) 276 Taxman 244 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment- After the expiry of four years-Deduction at source-Rent-Audit objection-Reassessment is held to be not valid. [S. 40(a)(ia) , 148 , 194I]

Sapta Panchait Kirshk Seva Swablambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. UOI (2021) 276 Taxman 7 /199 DTR 148 / 320 CTR 356(Patna)(HC)

S.143(3) : Assessment -Unexplained money-Initiation of penalty proceedings-Cryptic order-Non issue of notice-Violation of principle of natural justice-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 69C, 142(1), 271AAC, Art. 226]