Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kottex Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 437 ITR 211 / 282 Taxman 432 /(2022) 216 DTR 405/ 328 CTR 784 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Share application money-Shell bogus companies-Information from investigation wing-Notice and reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 68, 131, 148, Art. 226]

ESS Advertising (Mauritius) S. N. C. Et Compagnie v. ACIT(IT) (2021) 437 ITR 1 / 204 DTR 156/ 321 CTR 679 (Delhi)(HC) ESS Distribution (Mauritius) S.N.C. Et Compagnie v. ACIT(IT) (2021) 437 ITR 1/ 204 DTR 156/ 321 CTR 679 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Change of opinion-Sanction-Non application of mind-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 92CA(3), 143(3), 144C, 148, 151, Art. 226]

DRS Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (NO. 1) (2021) 437 ITR 673/ 205 DTR 63/ 322 CTR 295 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Reasons for notice were different from issues concluded during original assessment-Notice was held to be valid. [S. 143(3),148, Art. 226]

Dy.CIT. v. Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. (2021)437 ITR 605/ /206 DTR 10/ 322 CTR 623 / 283 Taxman 326 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of the single judge in Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (W.P. No. 43435 of 2016 and WMP Nos. 37296 and 37297 of 2016, reversed dt. 30-1-2018.Editorial: SLP of assessee dismissed , Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Pvt Ltd v. Dy.CIT ( 2022) 443 ITR 5( St)(SC)Editorial: SLP of assessee dismissed , Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Pvt Ltd v. Dy.CIT ( 2022) 443 ITR 5( St)(SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Other income not disclosed-Alternative remedy-Correctness of facts cannot be decided in writ proceedings-Reassessment proceedings is held to be valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (NO. 4) (2021) 437 ITR 457 208 DTR 217/ 323 CTR 955/ 283 Taxman 349 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Information by external agency-Sufficiency of reasons not to be gone into in Writ proceedings-Notice of reassessment is valid. [S. 148, 151, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (NO. 3) (2021) 437 ITR 438/ 323 CTR 252 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Change of opinion-Information from audit party-Sufficiency of reasons not to be gone into by High Court-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 10A, 10AA, 115JB, 148, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (NO. 2) (2021) 437 ITR 425/ 206 DTR 408/ 323 CTR 259(Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Within four years-Speaking order only with reference to reasons for reopening of assessment and not on all issues-Reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (No.1) (2021) 437 ITR 410/ 208 DTR 168/ 323 CTR 939 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Fringe benefits tax-Reason to believe-Information from audit-Disputed facts not to be adjudicated by Court-Reassessment proceeding is held to be valid. [S. 115WG, 115WH, 148, 150, Art. 226]

Amber v. Dy. CIT (2021) 437 ITR 45 / 282 Taxman 178 / 203 DTR 412 / 321 CTR 489 (Orissa) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and seizure-Information from DIT (Inv)-Bogus accommodation entries-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 68, 132(4), 148, Art. 226]

Sanjay Baulal Surana v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 269 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Accommodation entries-Information from Investigation wing-New material-Notice and rejection of objection was held to be valid. [S. 132, 148, Art. 226]