Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


C. V. Ravi v. ITO (2021) 430 ITR 449 / 279 Taxman 429 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed , C. V. Ravi v. ITO ( 2021 ) 281 Taxman 362 ( SC)

S. 68 : Cash credits- Burden to establish identity of creditors, genuineness of loan transaction and capacity of lender-Addition is held to be justified. [S. 260A]

CIT v. H. E. Panduranga (2021) 430 ITR 70/ 277 Taxman 480 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits- Block assessment- Matter remanded to the CIT (A) to consider unexplained cash credits . [S. 132, 143(3), 147, 158BA, 254(1)]

Alok Goenka v. CIT (2021)430 ITR 46 / 277 Taxman 527 / 207 DTR 235(Pat.)(HC)

S. 64 : Clubbing of income-Minor child-Interest from firm-Accounting year ended on December 31, 1975-Income cannot be clubbed for the relevant year. [S. 64(1)(iii), 66, 256(1)]

CIT v. Shriram Ownership Trust (2021) 430 ITR 356/197 DTR 153/ 318 CTR 233 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Individual-Natural living individuals-Donation received by discretionary Trust-Assessable as income from other sources. [S. 2(24)(xv), 2(31)(v), 56(2)(vii)]

PCIT v. Redington (India) Ltd. (2021) 430 ITR 298 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Transfer of shares to subsidiary in Mauritius- Transfer of Shares from subsidiary to Private Equity Fund incorporated in Cayman Islands-Transactions are not genuine-High Court has the power to find out if transactions are genuine.

CIT v. GRK Reddy and Sons (HUF) (2021) 430 ITR 283/ 277 Taxman 127 / 201 CTR 61(Mad.)(HC)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Agricultural land- Barren land-Sold to developer with in short period after purchase-Land not agricultural- Gains not exempt from tax. [S. 2(14)(iii), 10(1) Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, S. 63]

Anandkumar v. CIT (2021) 430 ITR 391/ 199 DTR 289/ 319 CTR 484/278 Taxman 342 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 44AD : Presumptive taxation-Individual partner of firm engaged in eligible business- Remuneration and interest could not be treated as gross receipts- Not entitled to benefit. [S. 28(v), 44AD(2)]

R. Venugopal v. Dy. CIT (2021) 430 ITR 471 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits- Issue remanded to CIT(A). [S. 40(a)(ia), 254(1)]

PCIT v. Tally Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 430 ITR 527 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Purchase of intellectual property-Depreciation is not an expenditure-No disallowance can be made for failure to deduct tax at source . [S. 32, 37(1), 40(a)(ia)]

CIT (LTU) v. Biocon Ltd. (2021) 430 ITR 151 / 276 Taxman 1 197 DTR 209/ 318 CTR 728 (Karn.)( HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Discount on employees Stock Option Plan-Allowable as deduction. [Companies Act, 1956, S. 2(15A)]