Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Mformation Software Technologies (I) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 182 ITD 78 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Functionally different-Companies having turn over of 10 times greater cannot be considered as comparable companies.

Goldman Sachs Services (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT (2020) 182 ITD 189 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Software development-Size and economies of scale/high risk companies-Functionally different-providing Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) To be excluded from final list of comparables-Working capital adjustment was directed to be allowed on actual basis.

Diageo India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 182 ITD 362 / 205 TTJ 622 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-AMP expenses-TPO cannot be debarred from examining said international transaction with respect to arm’s length price.[S. 92B]

Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 274 /77 ITR 52 (SN)/203 TTJ 691/186 DTR 50 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Addition of 10 percent-Allocation of expenses-Held to be not justified.

ACIT v. ITC Infotech India Ltd. (2020) 182 ITD 101/(2021) 209 TTJ 735 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Tested party-Cost Plus Method (CPM)-Audit of segmental accounts-Cannot be rejected on the ground that the Accounts of overseas entities were not audited.

Aithent Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 182 ITD 169 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Matter remanded to the TPO-Turnover cap-Goodwill-Loss making companies-Size and Economies of Sale/High Risk Companies.

ACIT v. WNS Global Services (P.) Ltd. (2020) 182 ITD 59 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-ITES services did not form a single composite transaction-Transactions cannot be aggregated-Extended credit period-Addition of notional interest is held to be not justified.

AT & S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik Aktiongesell Schaft v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 143 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Loan and advance-Interest-CUP method-Reimbursement of expenses-No adjustment can be made-Corporate guarantee was extended by assessee as a shareholder activity-No adjustment can be made. [S. 92B]

Co-Operative House Building Society Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 415 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Deposit from members-Assessing Officer passing the order, without verifying the licence to carryon banking business-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 80P(2)(a)(i)]

Ram Prakash Mahawar v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 55 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained investment-Jewellery-Weight of jewellery allowed as per instruction No 1916, dt. 11-5-1994 need not be explained-Addition cannot be made-Over and above the quantity of the jewellery has been explained, no addition can be made.