Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT(IT) v. Intelsat Corpn .( 2020) 119 taxmann.com 282 ( Delhi) (HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue , CIT(IT) v. Intelsat Corpn .( 2020) 274 Taxation 216/ 119 taxmann.com 283 (SC)

S. 9(1(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Royalty – Satellite communication services – Not taxable in India- DTAA-India -USA [ Art. 12 ]

CIT(IT) v. WNS Global Services ( UK) Ltd ( 2020) 117 taxmann.com 143 ( Bom) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed , CIT v. WNS Global Services ( UK) Ltd ( 2020) 272 Taxman 431 / 117 taxmann.com 144 (SC)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Business income – Royalty -Lease line charges -Reimbursement – Not liable to be assessed as business income or royalty- DTAA-India -UK . [ S.9(1)(vi), Art, 7 ,12 ]

Infineon Technologies India ( P) Ltd v .Dy CIT (2019) 112 taxmann.com 401 ( Karn) (HC) Editorial : SLP is granted Infineon Technologies India ( P) Ltd v .Dy CIT ( 2020) 269 Taxman 52 / 113 taxmmann.com 167 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Royalty – Import of software -Held to be royalty .

CIT ( IT) v. Bently Nevada LLC ( 2020) 114 taxmann.com 101 ( Delhi ) (HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed CIT ( IT) v. Bently Nevada LLC ( 2020) 270 Taxman 95 / 114 taxmann.com 102 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Royalty – Licence embedded software – Not royalty – Assessable as business income [ S.28(i) ]

Intel Technology India (P) Ltd v .CIT (IT) ( 2020) 121 taxmann.com 130 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Royalty – High Court has not decided on merit – Matter remanded- OECD Model Convention . [ Art, 12 ]

CIT v. United India Insurance Co ( 2019) 111 taxmann.com 217 (Mad) (HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the revenue , CIT v. United India Insurance Co ( 2020) 117 taxmann.com 849/ 273 Taxman 187 SC)

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Business connection – Survey fees paid outside India –Service rendered outside India – Not liable to deduct tax at source [ S.195 ]

Paraminder Singh Kalra v. CIT (2020) 429 ITR 577/196 DTR 433/ (2021) 318 CTR 211 / 279 Taxman 316(Delhi)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Trail for more than one offence-Offences and Prosecution-Undisclosed foreign asset-Three different complaints based on same transaction- Single prosecution to be conducted. [Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S.220,300, Constitution of India, Art .20(3), Indian Penal Code, S.71, General Clauses Act, S.26]

Angels Immigration And Educational Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI (2020) 429 ITR 1 / ( 2021) 199 DTR 78/ 319 CTR 435 (P&H)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Application pending before Settlement Commission-Does not Bar Criminal Prosecution. [S. 245C, 245D, 276C, 277, Indian Penal Code, 1860, S. 417]

Kaveri Associates v. ACIT (2020) 429 ITR 40 / 275 Taxman 545 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Notice not specifying the charge -Mere disbelieving of explanation is not sufficient- levy of penalty is held to be not valid. [S. 274]

PCIT v. N. K. Proteins Ltd. (2020)429 ITR 493 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Assessment passed after due verification by Assessing Officer-Not erroneous. [S. 40A(2)(b), 142(2A)]