S. 40 (a)(iib) :Amounts not deductible- Fee- Tax – Gallonge fee , licence fee and shop rental (KIST ) with respect to EL-9 and E.L -I licence granted will fall with in the purview of section and hence disallowable -Surcharge on Sales tax and turnover tax is not fee or charge hence not disallowable – Interpretation of taxing statutes – Same statute using different terms and expressions – Must be taken to refer to distinct and different things . [ S. 37(1)), Kerala Abkari Act, 1077 (M.E.) S. 18 , Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules , 1953 , R. 15A ]

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Whatsapp messages-Employee and promoter of group-Receipt of cash not proved-Penalty cannot be levied. [S. 269SS]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income-Assessee intimated Assessing Officer well in advance of inadvertence of including receipt-Assessing Officer did not specify in notice whether notice is issued for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. [S. 143(2)]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Disclosing full facts-Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 54F]

S. 263 : Revision of orders prejudicial to Revenue-Twin conditions to be satisfied-Assessment order cannot be said to be erroneous in law-Revision was quashed. [S. 54F]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limited scrutiny-The Revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 cannot be exercised for broadening the scope of jurisdiction that was originally vested with the A.O for limited scrutiny while framing the assessment and enlarging his scope of limited enquiry. [S. 143(3), 147]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Depreciation-Lease hold rights-Revision is held to be valid. [S. 32(1)(ii)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-No finding that the order is erroneous and prejudicial interest of revenue-Revision was held to be not valid-Disallowance of commission was held to be justified-Once the income is accepted in the Hand of HUF the said income cannot be assessed in the hands of individual. [S. 45]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Interest expenditure-Assumption of jurisdiction based on incorrect facts-Revision is held to be in valid. [S. 37(1)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Penalty Not subjected to search-Penalty cannot be Levied-Revision of order dropping penalty proceedings was quashed. [S. 132, 153C, 271AAB]