Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Savita Bhasin (Smt.) v. ITO (2020) 84 ITR 602/ (2021) 186 ITD 195 (Delhi)( Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains – Investment in a residential house – Joint Ownership cannot come in way of claiming exemption [ S.45 ]

Noida Cyber park (P.) Ltd v. ITO (2021) 186 ITD 593 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Addition cannot be made under section 50C on the transfer of leasehold rights in land or building.[ S.45 ]

Maria Fernandes Cherly v. ITO (IT )(2021) 187 ITD 738/ 123 Taxmann.com 252 /209 TTJ 850 /198 DTR 137/ 85 ITR 674 (Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 50C: Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Sale Consideration – Third proviso- Retrospective- Difference between the stated consideration vis -a -vis stamp duty valuation is less than 10 % of the stated consideration , section 50C is not applicable . [ S.45 ]

Santosh Kumar Subbaniv. ITO (2020) 122 taxmann.com 169 / (2021)186 ITD 217 (Hyd)( Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains – Transfer – Development agreement -No real development took place till date – Matter restored to AO to decide the capital gains after verifying whether the possession is taken back by the assessee or not and the assessee cancelled the development agreement or not.[ S.2(47) (v)]

Vijayeta Buildcon Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT (2021) 186 ITD 493 / 123 taxmann.com 133 (Jaipur) ( Trib.)

S. 40A(3) :Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits – purchase of lands from farmers – Disallowance deleted. [ R.6DD]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd v. ACIT (2020) 121 taxmann.com 190 (2021) 186 ITD 721 (Mum)( Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible – Rates or tax – Business expenditure – deduction for foreign taxes paid allowed while computing its income, to the extent that such tax was not entitled to the benefit of section 91 of the Act.[ S.37 (1), 91 ]

Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 118 taxmann.com 301 / (2021)186 ITD 353 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – expenditure on implementation of a new software package – Allowable as revenue expenditure.

Demag Delaval Industries Turbomachinery (P.) Ltd v. ACIT(2021) 186 ITD 228 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-expenditure incurred on affixing adhesive stamps on conveyance deed-held, it is revenue expenditure-provision for warranty-provision for present obligation due to past event-not a contingent liability-expenditure allowed-Depreciation on goodwill and customer contracts-held in nature of intangible assets, therefore eligible for depreciation [ S. 32. ]

Balaji Electrical Insulators (P) Ltd.v. Dy. CIT (2021) 186 ITD 1 (Ahd.) (Trib)

S. 36(1)(iii): Interest on borrowed capital –Interest free advances made-availability of sufficient own funds- addition deleted by the Tribunal-delay in payment to the account of Provident Fund-disallowance upheld-delay in pronouncement of order by the Tribunal-90 days period should exclude at least the lockdown period. [ S.254 (1), ITAT R. 34(5)]

Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd. v. ACI (2020) 118 taxmann.com 301/ (2021) 186 ITD 353 (Delhi (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – Ad-hoc disallowance – Deleted.[R.8D ]