Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Nocil Ltd. (2025) 345 CTR 549 (Bom)(HC)

S. 72A : Carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation-Amalgamation-Demerger-Scheme of restructuring involving transfer of only specified assets and liabilities and consideration paid in cash and not by issue of shares-Provisions of s. 72A(4) not attracted-Assessee entitled to carry forward and set off of loss. [S. 2(19AA), 2 (19AAA), 72A(4)]

Gautham Chand Jain v. ACIT (2025) 304 Taxman 640 / 345 CTR 328 / 250 DTR 132 (Mad)(HC) Sumermal Kantilal Jain v. ACIT (2025) 304 Taxman 640 / 345 CTR 328 / 250 DTR 132 (Mad)(HC)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Search and seizure-Cash seized-Commission income-Mere declaration without proof of source-In absence of satisfactory explanation with supporting material, addition u/s 69A justified and taxable u/s 115BBE. [S. 115BBE, 132)

PCIT v. Wise Investment (P) Ltd. (2025) 175 taxmann.com 692/ 345 CTR 218 / 251 DTR 1 (Cal)(HC) PCIT v. Femina Stock Management Company Ltd (2025) 175 taxmann.com 692/ 345 CTR 218 / 251 DTR 1 (Cal)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital / Share premium-Identity, creditworthiness and genuineness established-Deletion of addition justified-No substantial question of law. [S. 260A]

T.R. Balasubramanium v. ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 526 / 251 DTR 182 (Mad)(HC)

S. 49 : Capital gains—Previous owner—Cost of acquisition—Sale of asset received on liquidation of company—Asset received on liquidation and sold in same year—Both ss. 49(1)(iii)(c) and 55(2)(b)(iii) applicable—Proper computation to consider both transactions-The Tribunal, though accepting the legal position canvassed by the assessee, decided the issue against the assessee solely on the ground that earlier coordinate Bench decisions in cases of other assessees were adverse, instead of referring the matter to a Larger Bench. The High Court held that such an approach was incorrect-Order of Tribunal set aside and assessee’s method upheld. [S. 45, 46(2), 48, 49(1)(iii)(c), 55(2)(b)(iii), 254(1),]

PCIT v. Remfry & Sagar (2025) 171 taxmann.com 391 / 345 CTR 703 / 252 DTR 103 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Affirmed, Remfry & Sagar v. Jt. CIT (2016) 182 TTJ 744(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Penalty, fine, etc.-Payment of licence fee for use of goodwill by legal firm to heirs of goodwill owner-Alleged breach of Bar Council of India Rules not an offence or purpose prohibited by law-Deduction allowable. [S. 37(1), Explanation.]

PCIT v. WGF Financial Services (P.) Ltd. (2025) 345 CTR 400 / 250 DTR 329 / 304 Taxman 222 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Loss on account of guarantee obligation to group company-Financing business-Isolated transaction-Arrangement resulting in transfer of losses within group-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 36(2), 37(1)]

CIT (E) v. Shree Vimalnath Jain Swetamber Mandir Trust (2025) 174 taxmann.com 63/ 345 CTR 868 / 250 DTR 272 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution-Objects of the assessee trust are both charitable as well as religious in nature-Entitle for registration-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S.260A]

Maheswara Educational Society v. DCIT (E) (2025) 345 CTR 391 / 251 DTR 265 / 175 taxmann.com 74 (Telangana)(HC).

S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution-Retrospective registration-Delay in application-Assessee having claimed exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) from inception, being aware of statutory requirements, but not seeking registration under section 12A and failing to furnish cogent and justifiable reasons for delay-Denial of retrospective registration held justified. [S. 10(23C)(iiiad), 260A]

Mehmood Askari v. UOI (2025) 305 Taxman 528 / 345 CTR 227 / 251 DTR 114 (J&K)(HC)

S. 10(26) : Schedule Tribes-Residing in Ladakh-Failure to prove residence in specified area and income derived from such area-Mere production of ST certificate not sufficient-Concurrent findings of fact not interfered with in writ jurisdiction-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 144, 264, Art. 226]

PCIT v. NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd. (2025) 174 taxmann.com 20 / 345 CTR 673 / 251 DTR 369 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Accrual-Sale of fly ash-Did not belong to assessee-A separate utilization account as mandated, and used funds solely for specified purposes without deriving any benefit or ownership-Income not accrued to assessee-Sale proceeds were not taxable.[S. 5, 260A]