Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Subhash Chander Gupta v. ITO (2025) 235 TTJ 883 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Income from undisclosed sources-Search-Notings on loose paper-Third-party presumption-Failure to give an opportunity of cross-examination-Addition was deleted. [S.132, 132(4)]

Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal v. DCIT (2025) 235 TTJ 833 / 174 taxmann.com 276 (All) (Trib)

S. 69: Unexplained investments-Income from undisclosed sources-Survey-Investment in immovable property-AO was right in bringing the undisclosed income to tax under the special provisions of S. 69 and thereafter levying tax under the provisions of S. 115BBE.[S.69B, 115BBE, 292B]

Kavya Satija v. Dy. CIT (2025) 235 TTJ 217 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 68: Cash credits-Share transactions-Capital gains-Cannot be assessed as sham transaction-Addition was deleted. [S. 10(38,45]

Fakhruddin T. Malik v. ITO (2025) 235 TTJ 906 (SMC) (Mum)(Trib)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Difference between the stamp duty value as on the date of agreement and the agreement value of the flats-Reference to DVO-Issue is restored to the AO for de novo adjudication after seeking a valuation report from the DVO as per the provisions of the Act. [S.50C(2), 56(2)(vii)(b)]

Utility Supply (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 235 TTJ 601 /124 ITR 324 / 174 taxmann.com 250 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 56: Income from other sources-Shares purchased for trading purposes-Stock in trade-Shares purchased for trading purposes, provisions of section 56(2)(viia) cannot be applied. [S. 562(viia)]

DCIT v. Kruti Lalitkumar Jain (2025) 235 TTJ 32/ 170 taxmann.com 465 (Pune) Trib)

S.54F: Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Purchase of house property-Execution of sale deed beyond the specified period-MoU on 21st Aug., 2015-Entitled to exemption. [S. 45]

OPG Power Generation (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 235 TTJ 286 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Payment of freight charges to foreign shipping companies-Disallowance was affirmed.[S. 5(2), 195]

Bosch Global Software Technologies (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 235 TTJ 807 / 174 taxmann.com 76 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-State tax paid in USA-Not claimed any benefit of the tax paid in the USA under the provisions of S. 90/91-State tax paid in USA is allowable as deduction.

ACIT v Ludhiana Beverages (P) Ltd. (2025) 235 TTJ 535 (Amritsar)(Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Advertisement material and goods-Purchase of icebox and plastic tables and chairs, bearing the logo-Allowable as business expenditure.

Vgm Export v. JCIT (2025) 235 TTJ 526 / 172 taxmann.com 819 (Panaji) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Foreign exchange fluctuation loss-Working capital-Allowable as a deduction. [S. 145, AS-11]