Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kamal Galani v. ACIT ( 2020) 194 DTR 273/ 207 TTJ 1049 (Mum)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S. 69 :Unexplained investments – HSBC Bank -Black Money- Burden is on revenue to prove that money belongs to the assessee- Mere holding a joint bank account does not mean that the money belongs to the assessee- Addition is deleted [ S.69A ]

CIT v. Sadiq Sheikh ( 2020) 429 ITR 163 / 122 taxmann.com 39 /(2021) 276 Taxman 292 / 197 DTR 191/ 318 CTR 382 ( Bom) (HC) (Goa Bench) /CIT v. Sadia Sheikh (2020) 429 ITR 163 / 122 taxmann.com 39 /(2021)276 Taxman 292/ 197 DTR 191/ 318 CTR 382 (Bom.)(HC) ,www.itatonline.org/Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed , Sadiq Sheikh v. CIT ( 2021) 277 Taxman 594 ( SC)

S. 68 : Cash credits- Source of source – Cash deposited – Brother in law and close friends – How money was transferred from Bangalore to Goa was not satisfactorily explained – – Addition is held to be justified .[ S. 153A ]

Highstreet Developers Pvt Ltd v .ITO (2020) The Chamber’s Journal – December – P.179 ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure – Temporary suspension of business -Real estate business-Work in progress- Change in method of accounting – Genuineness of expenses not doubted – Allowable as deduction [ S.145 ]

Elgi Equipments Ltd v .JCIT (2020) 120 taxmann.com 142/ (2021) 276 Taxman 141 ( Mad ) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure –Capital or revenue- Foreign travel expenditure -Acquisition of business- Repair and maintenance – Bonafide expenditure incurred , wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business would be allowable .

DIT v. Autodesk Asia Pvt. Ltd. ( 2020) 275 Taxman 319/ 120 taxmann.com 324 (Karn)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Royalty -Interpretation of statutes and DTAA – DTAA- India – Singapore [ S. 9(1) (vii), 90 , 195 , Art . 12 ]

DZ Bank AG – India Representative Office v. DCIT (Mum)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S.139: Return- A representative office of a foreign enterprise is not a taxable unit-The foreign enterprise is the taxable unit- A return of income filed in the name of the representative office, with the PAN of the enterprise, offering only the income of the representative office & excluding the other Indian income of the enterprise is not proper- DTAA- India -Germany [ S. 9 (1) (i), 115A(5), Art .7, 11(5) ]

Bank of India v. ACIT (Mum)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S. 90 :Double taxation relief – Book Profit – The fact that profits of foreign branches of a resident are taxed outside India under tax treaties does not imply that the said income is not taxable in India. The entire global income has to be taxed in India- The assesseee is entitled to credit for taxes paid abroad, as admissible under the treaty or the domestic law – Even profits of foreign branches which are taxed under the tax treaties are also liable for MAT. [ S.115JB ]

Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co. v. ACIT (2021)85 ITR 49 ( SN)/197 DTR 19/ 209 TTJ 1 /187 ITD 750 (Mum)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S. 90 :Double taxation relief – Foreign Tax Credit – One has to take a judicious call as to whether the view adopted by the source jurisdiction of taxing the income is a reasonable and bonafide view, which may or may not be the same as the legal position in the residence jurisdiction- The view of the treaty partner should be adopted unless it is wholly unreasonable or manifestly erroneous- Entitle for Foreign Tax Credit -. DTAA -India -Japan [ Art 12 , 22 ]

Interactive Avenues Pvt Ltd v DCIT ( 2020) 196 DTR 249// 208 TTJ 945 ( 2021 ) 187 ITD 463 www.itatonline.org Mum) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – When no deduction is claimed while computing business income , no disallowance can be made for failure to deduct tax at source [ S.30, 38 ]

Procter and Gamble Hygiene And Health Care Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020) 83 ITR 9 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 271G : Penalty-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Department must mention document and information required to be furnished but not furnished by assessee within specified time-Levy of penalty is held to be not valid.