Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT v. EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 5 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Staff welfare expenses, staff recruitment expenses, expenses pertaining to employees meals on duties, medical expenses, medical insurance, uniform expenses are incidental to carrying on business-Expenditure wholly and exclusively for purpose of business is allowable.

Dy.CIT v. EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 5 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Advertisement-details furnished in respect of two out of three units-Disallowance restricted to 2 per cent. of estimate.

Dy. CIT v. EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 5 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Advances given to subsidiary-Advance made as a measure of commercial expediency-Interest is allowable.

Dy. CIT v. EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 5 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business Expenditure-Investment in shares only 11 Per Cent of own funds, no proportionate disallowance of interest warranted.

Dy.CIT v. Sisecam Flat Glass India Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 1 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 37 (1) : Business expenditure-Interest rate hedging contract-Underlying transaction was interest payable on loan-loss or gain from interest rate swap arrangement is allowable as revenue expenditure.

UHDE India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 190 ITD 777/ 211 TTJ 339 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Major renovation-Expenditure on repairs & renovation of office premises held to be allowable as business expenditure. [S. 30]

Addlife Investments (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 187 ITD 591/201 DTR 145 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Business of investment in shares-Interest paid is allowable as deduction.

Trimurty Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 505 / 211 TTJ 249 /(2022) 209 DTR 322(Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Amount of revenue generation does not, in any manner, affect the claim of deduction.

Addlife Investments (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT DCIT (2020) 84 ITR 343 / (2021) 187 ITD 591/ 211 TTJ 581(Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 35D : Amortisation of preliminary expenses-Raising authorised capital-Eligible for deduction.

DCIT v. STP Ltd. (2021) 187 ITD 538 / 86 ITR 14 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 35 : Scientific research expenditure-Deduction could not be denied merely because prescribed authority failed to send intimation in Form 3CL in respect of expenditure incurred by R&D unit for relevant assessment year. [S. 35(2AB)]