Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT v. Vasavi Manikandan Hospital Trust (2021) 432 ITR 393 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 12A : Registration-Trust or institution-Order of Tribunal directing to grant registration is up held with the observation that department at liberty to cancel registration if conditions violated.

Elsevier Bv, IN RE (2021) 432 ITR 251 / 201 DTR 209/ 321 CTR 423 (AAR)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Publishing Information on science in electronic format-Web based information-E-Books, E-Journals, Articles-Not royalty-Indian subscribers not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-Netherlands. [S. 28(i), 90, 195, Art. 7(12)(4)]

Aircom International Ltd., IN RE (2021) 432 ITR 1 / 198 DTR 249 / 319 CTR 337 (AAR)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees-Non-Resident-Providing management support services-Not royalty-Payment received are not business income DTAA-India-UK [S. 9(1)(i),.90, 195, Art. 5, 13 (4)]

Technip France Sas, In Re (2021) 432 ITR 338 / 198 DTR 193 / 319 CTR 113 (AAR)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Returns filed after filing of application would not make application infructuous-Returns filed after filing of application would not make application infructuous-Business connection-Sale complete outside India therefore no income accrued or deemed to accrue in India-Fixed place of business is held to be permanent establishment-Composite contract on turnkey basis for setting up butene-1 Plant-Services taxable in India-Design services inextricably connected with setting up of plant-Profits of permanent establishment to be taxed in India as business Income-DTAA-India-France. [S. 245RR, Art. 7 (1), 13(4)]

Technip France Sas, In Re (2021) 432 ITR 338 / 198 DTR 193 / 319 CTR 113 (AAR)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Returns filed after filing of application would not make application infructuous-Returns filed after filing of application would not make application infructuous-Business connection-Sale complete outside India therefore no income accrued or deemed to accrue in India-Fixed place of business is held to be permanent establishment-Composite contract on turnkey basis for setting up butene-1 Plant-Services taxable in India-Design services inextricably connected with setting up of plant-Profits of permanent establishment to be taxed in India as business Income-DTAA-India-France. [S. 245RR, Art. 7(1), 13(4)]

Symphony Technology Group Llc, In Re (2021) 432 ITR 165 (AAR)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Non-resident-Capital gains-Share transaction between two non-resident entities are not liable to tax in India-Buyer is not required to deduct tax at source. [S. 195, ITAT R. 11UB IIUC]

Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd., IN RE (2021) 432 ITR 173 (AAR)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Income-Diversion by overriding title-Right to recover gap only on approval-Appeal pending before Appellate Authority and Court-Regulatory Assets under approval received is not taxable on account of diversion of income by overriding title.

Jamuna Vernekar (Smt.) v. Dy.CIT (2021) 432 ITR 146 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 2(22)(e): Deemed dividend-Loan to share holder-Commercial transaction-Advance for construction of building-Not assessable as deemed dividend. [S.1150]

Salzgitter Hydraulics (P.) Ltd v. ITO ( 2021) 128 taxmann.com 192 ( Hyd) ( Trib)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment – Amendment by Finance Act , 2021 disallowance employee’s contribution to ESI/PF is applicable prospectively [ S. 36 (1) (va), 139 (1) ]

Peter Vaz v. CIT ( 2021) 436 ITR 616/ 204 DTR 376/ 322 CTR 121 / 128 taxmann.com 180/ 281 Taxman 171 ( Bom) (HC)/Edgar Braz Afonso v CIT ( 2021) 436 ITR 616/ 204 DTR 376/ 322 CTR 121 128 taxmann.com 180 / 281 Taxman 171 ( Bom) (HC)

S. 255 : Appellate Tribunal – Procedure – Cross objection- Jurisdiction issue can be raised before ITAT , without filing cross objection- Matter remanded to Tribunal for fresh consideration of appeals instituted by revenue after permitting assessee to raise issue of non-compliance with in jurisdictional parameters of section 153C of the Act .Delay of 248 days in filing cross objection was condoned . [S.153C, 253, 254 (1) , ITAT R, 27, Form . 36A ,Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 rule 2 of Order II , Limitation Act, 1963 Limitation Act, 1963 , S. 5 ]