S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-No Permanent Establishment during relevant assessment year for activities relating from which Assessee had earned revenue-could not be taxed as business profit carried out through PE in India-Appeal Allowed-DTAA-India-Spain. [S. 90, Art. 13(4)]

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Indian representative office and the bank itself are one unit-They are taxed only once-DTAA-India-German. [S. 2(31), 253, Art.7, 11]

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Shipping business-Invocation of article 24 of India-Singapore DTAA not justified-Exemption under article 8 is allowed-DTAA-India-Singapore. [S. 44B, 172, Art. 8, 24, Singapore Income-tax Act, S 13F]

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Explanation 7 to section 9(1)(i) has a retrospective effect-Sale proceeds of shares of foreign company which held investment in India is not taxable. [S. 5]

S. 132 : Search and seizure – Seizure of stock in trade – Seizure was held to be illegal – Directed to release the stock in trade and also directed to pay interest of Rs 1 lakh to the petitioner [ S. 132 (4), 132B, Art , 226 ]

S. 276D : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to produce books of accounts-Documents-Three separate complaint were part of same transaction-Clubbing of complaints and joint trail was allowed. [S. 276C(1), 277, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S.200]

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Mere failure to pay income tax based on self assessment would not constitute offence-Proceedings was quashed. [S. 27C(2), 276CC, 278E]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Under-invoicing-Justice Shah Commission report-Notice based on reports of Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO)-Assessment was completed without proper inquiries-Revision is held to be justified, it was competent for Commissioner to invoke revisional jurisdiction and direct fresh assessment.

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Scientific research-100 per cent EOUs-Expenditure on R&D claimed under section 35(2AB) had no connection whatsoever with 100 per cent EOUs-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 10B, 35(2AB)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business income or capital gains-Revision is held to be not justified. [S. 28(i), 45]