Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 84 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – Comparable Benchmarking of Transaction — Marketing support services same functions – Can be treated as comparable —Deriving its income from manufacturing or trading and indenting services — Not good Comparable for company rendering market support services.

Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2020)78 ITR 305 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – Debt-free company —Adjustment in relation to notional interest on overdue receivables is held to be not justified- Comparable – Company having controlled transactions — High brand value and high turnover of company —Held not comparables.

Ultimate Flexipack Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 410( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 80IB: Industrial undertakings – Sub-Licensing income — Royalty — Not related to manufacturing activity – Income excludible on net basis after adjusting loyalty paid against sub-licensing income [ S.80IC ]

Carestream Health Inc. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 599/ 193 DTR 41/206 TTJ 835 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 74 : Losses – Long-term capital loss — Reduction of share capital — Amounts to transfer —Loss arising due to cancellation of shares allowable as long-term capital loss eligible to be carried forward to subsequent years [ S.2(47) ]

Rajesh Passi v .ITO (2020)78 ITR 221 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credit — Unsecured loan — Failure to prove genuineness – Addition is held to be justified .

Puneet Jain v. ITO (2020)78 ITR 41/ 208 TTJ 1011(Delhi) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits — Bogus purchases from bogus firm — Forensic Expert’s report showing that account of firm operated in handwriting of assessee and all deposits and withdrawals made in handwriting of assessee —Not availing of opportunity to cross-examine forensic expert —Addition is held to be justified — Addition on account of bogus sales out of bogus purchases will result in double addition — Addition on debit entry to be deleted . [ S.145 ]

Nimbus (India) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 648 / (20021) 209 TTJ 986/ 199 DTR 273 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Share application money – Source of investment, identity and creditworthiness of investors and genuineness of transaction established – Addition is held to be not valid . [ S.14A, 131, 153A ]

ITO v. Skyways Industrial Estate Co. P. Ltd. (2020)78 ITR 320 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits — Share application money — Accommodation entries — Entry provider in his statement not stating investor company one of concerns controlled by him — Assumption Of accommodation entries vitiated by fact -Addition unsustainable.

Rosewood Buildwell P. Ltd. v. ITO (2020)78 ITR 592 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Share application money — Nature and source satisfactorily explained —Addition is held to be not valid – Derivative loss – Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer .

Ultimate Flexipack Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 410 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits — Advance receipt from parties —Excess amount offered to tax in subsequent year — Advance receipt not taxable as cash credit.