Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Carol Securities Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 469 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S.68: Cash credits — Security deposits —Lack of full details of parties – Addition is held to be justified .

Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v Add. CIT (2020)78 ITR 305 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Difference between form no 26AS and tax credit statement – Assessing Officer is directed to examine reconciliation statement .

ACIT v .Justice T. S. Arunachalam (2020)78 ITR 290 ( Chennai ) (Trib)

S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence -Depositing entire sale proceeds in savings bank account- construction of house – Not depositing the amount in specified bank account – Technical breach —Entitled to exemption [ S.45, 54(2),54F ]

Rameshchandra Chhabildas Tamakuwala v. JCIT (2020)78 ITR 148 (Surat) (Trib)

S.45: Capital gains — Long-term capital gains —Land held for more than thirty-six months —Treatment given in books of account immaterial —Converting Stock-in-trade into capital asset-Gains assessable as long-term capital gains and not business income — Entitled to set off gains against brought forward long-term capital loss —Entitled to indexation [ S.2(42A), 74 ]

Rajesh Passi v .ITO (2020)78 ITR 221 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment – Service tax – Amount neither paid nor added in computation of income.

Darashaw and Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 553 ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction – Transactions in Derivatives in Futures and Options segments of National Stock Exchange — Marked to Market Loss — Not to be assessed speculative loss .

Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v .Add. CIT (2020)78 ITR 305 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Car lease rentals – Directed to furnish evidence that whether the payee had shown receipts as their income . [ S.37(1) ]

A. K. Industries v .ACIT (2020)78 ITR 462 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Short deduction of tax at source – No disallowance can be made .[ S.194C ]

Torrence Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 96 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure – Revised return — Claim of assessee acceptable with regard to expenditure involved as allowable expenditure — Disallowance is held to be not valid . [ S.139(1) ]

Royal Challengers Sports Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 577 (Bang) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure — Contribution to State Cricket Association to create cricket academy —Getting first right to recruit players from academy to play for assessee — Allowable as business expenditure .