Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Mahendra B.Mittal ( HUF) v .Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib) Mahendra Balakrishna Mittal v Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib) Pooja Mahendra Mittal ( Smt ) v. Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib) Vijayrattan Balakridhna Mittal v. Dy CIT ( 2020) 203 TTJ 288 ( Mum) ( Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Penny stock – Accomodation entries – Sale of shares – Capital gains – Exemption – Addition cannot be made on presumption – Entitle to exemption – When no incriminating material was not found in the course of search , no addition can be made – Estimation of commission was also deleted . [ S.10 (38) 45 , 69C , 132 ,133(6), 153A]

D.S.Patil v .PCIT (Bang ) ( Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Penalty dropped by Assessing Officer on consideration of replies – Revision order directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings was quashed [ S. 132(4), 153A, 153C, 271AAB ]

Mahadev Cold Storage v. JAO ( 2021 ) 190 ITD 273/ 212 TTJ 801/ 205 DTR 145 ( 2021 ) 190 ITD 273/ 212 TTJ 801/ 205 DTR 145 (Agra ) ( Trib) www.itatonline .org Vinod Thanwerdas v. JAO ( 2021 ) 190 ITD 273/ 212 TTJ 801/ 205 DTR 145 (Agra ) ( Trib) www.itatonline .org

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment – Employee’s contribution -paid before due date of filing of return –Allowable as deduction – Binding Precedent – Faceless assessment -Order of Jurisdictional High Court – binding on AO situated within territorial jurisdiction and respective first appellate authority. [ S. 2 (24)(x), 36 (1)(va), 139 (1), 143 (3) ]

Yerram Venkata Subba Reddy.v. ACIT ( 2020) 196 DTR 41 / 208 TTJ 885/ (2021) 187 ITD 22 (Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Loss on account of sale of shares – Mere non-mentioning of reasons for allowing said claim of assessee by Assessing Officer would not make assessment order erroneous so as to invoke revision jurisdiction- Unabsorbed depreciation – Sale of land -Difference between stamp value and actual consideration received – Addition is justified – loss on sale of vehicle – Remanded to Assessing Officer . [ S.28 (i),50, 50C , 72, 143 (3) ,170 ]

Interactive Avenues (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT ( 2020) 196 DTR 249// 208 TTJ 945 (2021) 187 ITD 463 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source -Non-resident –Advertisement expenses – Expenditure not claimed as deduction – No disallowance can be made- Matter remanded . [ S .30 to 38, 195 ]

South India Club. v .CIT ( 2020) 194 DTR 320 / 207 TTJ 844/ (2021) 187 ITD 492 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution- Charitable objects- Registration cannot be denied on ground that no activities had been carried out by Trust [ S. 2(15), 11, 12A ]

Om Prakash Agarwal. v. DCIT ( 2020) 194 DTR 199/ 207 TTJ 121 / (2021) 187 ITD 499 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Sale consideration more than District level committee rate – Addition is held to be not justified .[ S.45 ] S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Sale consideration more than District level committee rate – Addition is held to be not justified .[ S.45 ]

IFFCO E-Bazar Ltd v. ACIT [2021] 85 ITR 38 (SN) (Delhi ) (Trib)

S. 28 (i) : Business loss- Commencement of business — Purchase and sale – A single transaction may constitute business – Business expenditure are allowable and loss is entitle to carry forward . [ S. 2 (13) 37 (1) , 79 ]

Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. ACIT ( 2021 ) 434 ITR 1/ 200 DTR 65/ 320 CTR 26/ 280 Taxman 334 /125 taxmann.com 253 ( FB ) (Bom) (HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Non-striking off of the irrelevant part while issuing notice under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act,- Order is bad in law – Assessee must be informed of the grounds of the penalty proceedings only through statutory notice. An omnibus notice suffers from the vice of vagueness. [ S.274 ]

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. ITO ( 2021 ) 190 ITD 172 (SMC ) (Mum) (Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Assessee is engaged in educational activities to spread education in matters relating to tax laws, other laws and accountancy-Entitle to exemption – Order of CIT (A) denying the exemption was reversed . [ S. 2 (15), 12A, 80G ]