Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dr. K.R. Rajashekar Reddy v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 121 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Hindu undivided family-Capital gain-Individual or HUF-Remanded for fresh decision. [S. 139(5)]

PCIT v. Jewels Magnnum ( 2020) 120 taxmann.com 316/ 275 Taxman 134 ( Mad ) (HC) Editorial: Order in Jewels Magnnum v.ACIT ( 2016) 158 ITD 185 ( Chennai) (Trib) is affirmed .

S. 10AA : Special economic zones – Approval – Medallion – Manufacture of gold jewellery – Entitle for exemption .

PCIT v .IGate Computer Systems Ltd ( 2020) 114 taxmann. 680 ( Bom) (HC)

S. 10A : Free trade zone – Splitting up or reconstruction – Three units at different locations – Approval from Authority of Software Technology Park of India ( STPI) -Entitle to deduction .

CIT v. L & T Valdel Engineering (P.) Ltd (2020) 119 taxmann.com 443 / 275 Taxman 115 ( Karn) (HC)

S. 10A : Free trade zone – Splitting up or reconstruction – Purchase of new computers -Not owning the land – Site development of software programme – Eligible exemption.

TTK Healthcare TPA Pvt Ltd (No. 1) v. Dy CIT(TDS)( 2020) 195 DTR 209/ 317 CTR 684/ (2021) 430 ITR 134 (Karn)( HC)

S. 194J : Deduction at source – Fees for professional or technical services -Provision of third party administrator services to insured — Service providers have to deduct tax from payments made to Hospitals – Circular No. 8 Of 2009, dated 24-11-2009 (2009) 319 ITR (St.) 22) is not valid to extent it provides for penalty for infraction of Section 194J [ S.119(1), 271C , 273B, Art . 226 ]

PCIT v. Akshat Shah( 2020) 193 DTR 77/ 316 CTR 817 / (2021) 430 (Guj)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission – Offer of small portion of disputed amount voluntarily — Justified in accepting the offer .[ S.245D(4), Art, 226 ]

V. Sabitamani v. ACIT(2020) 194 DTR 301/ 317 CTR 463 / (2021)430 ITR 490 (Mad)(HC)

S. 32: Depreciation — Actual cost — Purchase of second-hand Windmill —Disallowance of depreciation is held to be justified .[ 43(1), Expln. 3, 143(3), 147 ]

New Era Shipping Ltd. v. CIT ( 2020) 196 DTR 137/(2021) 430 ITR 431 / 318 CTR 400 (Bom) (HC)

S.147:Reassessment —Failure to furnish reasons recorded by Assessing Officer — Furnishing the recorded reasons when the matter was pending before Appellate Tribunal-Tribunal remanding the matter – Order of Tribunal remanding matter and subsequent assessment and demand notice set aside [ S.148 , 254(1) ]

Karle International Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT ( 2020) 196 DTR 473/ 274 Taxman 461 /(2021)430 ITR 74/ 318 CTR 478 (Karn)(HC) . Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed , ACIT v. Karle International (P) Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 97 (SC)

S. 10B: Export oriented undertakings – Loss -Set off -Export oriented units -Deduction cannot be thrust- Entitled to set off losses from export oriented units against profits of domestic tariff area unit[ S.(10B(6)(ii), 70, 72, 74 ]

PCIT v. S. Yogarathnam( 2020) 193 DTR 369/ 317 CTR 116/ 273 Taxman 513/ (2021)430 ITR 82 (Mad)(HC)

S. 251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Duties – Appellate Tribunal- General principles – Appellate authorities must consider facts and pass speaking orders- The Principal Chief CIT shall ensure that in all cases, the Department is represented before the first appellate authority and the Tribunal not only to defend the cases of the Department, but also to assist in the decision making process- Matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals). [ S. 254(1) ]