Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Vijay Sajnani v. UOI 2017 (345) ELT 323 (SC)/MANU/SC/1312/2012

S. 131 : Power regarding discovery , production of evidence ,etc- Investigation and Enquiry – Summons under Customs Act – Presence of Advocate during interrogation of Petitioner – To be within visible range but beyond hearing range – Advocate must be prepared to be present for every summons made. [Customs Act, 1962 S. 108]

Navnitlal C. Javeri v. K. K. Sen AAC (1965) 56 ITR 198 (SC)

S.119: Central Board of Direct Taxes – Instructions – Circulars binding on revenue. [ Indian Income -tax Act , 1922 , S .2(6A)(e), 12(IB) ]

Apollo Tyres Ltd v. CIT (2002) 255 ITR 273/122 Taxman 562/174 CTR 521 (SC)

S. 115J : Book profit – Net profits in profit and loss account prepared in accordance with Parts II and III of Schedule VI to Companies Act – Accounts scrutinised and certified by statutory auditors – Assessing Officer has no power to scrutinise except as provided in Explanation. [ Companies Act , 1956 , Parts II and III of Schedule VI ]

DIT v. Morgan Stanley & Co. (2007) 292 ITR 416/210 CTR 419/162 Taxman 165/201 Taxation 160 (SC)

S. 92C: Avoidance of tax – Transfer pricing – Arms’ length price –Transactional Net Margin Method is the appropriate method in the case of service PE as it apportions the total operating profit arising from the transaction on the basis of sales, costs, assets, etc -Attribution of profit to permanent establishment – DTAA – India-USA. [S.9(1) , 90 , 92B , Art. 7]

UOI v. Azadi Bachao Andolan (2003) 263 ITR 706/132 Taxman 373/184 CTR 450 (SC)

S. 90 : Double taxation relief – India – Mauritius DTAA – Circular No. 789 ( 2000) 243 ITR (St) 57 , not ultra vires the provisions of the Income-tax Act [S.2(17, 5(2) , 6(3) , 119 , Art .3, 4, 13(4) ]

CIT v. P.V.A.L. Kulandagan Chettiar (2004) 267 ITR 654/137 Taxman 460/189 CTR 193 (SC)

S. 90 : Double taxation relief – Business income arising out of rubber plantations in Malaysia cannot be taxed in India – capital gains derived from immovable property is not taxable in India as the property being situated in Malaysia – In case of conflict between Income-tax Act and the provisions of DTAA, provisions of DTAA would prevail over the provisions of Income-tax Act – DTAA India – Malaysia [S. 4, 5, 28(i), 45, Art . 4, 5, 6, 7 & 22]

CIT v. Veena Developers (2015) 277 CTR 297/119 DTR 237/66 taxmann.com 353 (SC)

S. 80IB(10) : Housing Projects – If the project is approved by local authority as housing project with convenience shopping the assessee is entitled to deduction – Prior to
1-4-2005 – Clause (d) inserted to Section 80IB(10) with effect from 1-4-2005 is prospective and not retrospective and hence cannot be applied for the period prior to 1-4-2005.

CIT v. Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd (2020) 423 ITR 267/313 CTR 489/187 DTR 351/115 taxmann.com 108 / 272 Taxman 509(SC)

S. 80IA: Industrial undertaking – Conversion of a partnership firm into a company – Part IX of Companies Act – As per S. 575 of the Companies Act, the conversion of a partnership firm into a company under Part IX causes a statutory vesting of all assets of the firm into the company without the need for a conveyance – The business of the firm is carried on by the company and the latter is eligible for the benefits of S. 80IA(4) of the Act. [S. 80IA(4), Companies Act, 1956 , S. 575 ]

India Cine Agencies v. CIT (2008) 175 Taxman 361/220 CTR 223/(2009) 308 ITR 98/15 DTR 121/209 Taxation 410 (SC) Computer Graphics Ltd. v. CIT (2008) 175 Taxman 361/220 CTR 223/(2009) 308 ITR 98/15 DTR 121/209 Taxation 410 (SC)

S. 80HH: Newly established industrial undertakings – Backward areas – Manufacture – Conversion of Jumbo rolls into small flat and rolls amounts to manufacture . [S. 2(29B), 32AB ,80I]

CIT v. Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochemical Ltd. (2012) 349 ITR 352/210 Taxman 229/79 DTR 8/254 CTR 98 (SC)

S. 80HH: Newly established industrial undertakings – Maintenance of separate books of accounts unit wise is not mandatory – Neither section 80HH, nor section 80I statutorily obliged assessee to maintain accounts unit wise – Consolidated accounts held to be valid and revision held not valid. [S. 80I, 263]