S. 245D : Settlement commission-Second application is maintainable-Order of Settlement commission cannot be neither in violation of any statutory provisions of the Income-tax Act nor is there any defect in the decision making process-Writ of the revenue was dismissed. [S. 132, 245C, 245HA, Art. 226]

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Educational institution-Application is allowed to be proceeded with-Settlement Commission have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided under section 245F of the Act-Withdrawal of exemption by Director General (Inv.) was held to be not valid. [S. 10(23C)(iv), 132, 153A, 245C, 245F(2) Art, 226]

S. 240 : Refund-Appeal effect was not given for eight months-Court directed to pass appeal effect order and to grant refund along with interest. [S. 154, 244A, Art. 226]

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Mere grant of stay of demand the assessee cannot be absolved from mandatory levy of interest. [S.220(2)]

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and Seizure-In absence of any incriminating documents or evidence discovered against assesse the assessment is bad in law. [S. 12AA, 132]

S. 148 : Reassessment-Transfer pricing-Objection not disposed of against reassessment notice-Single judge directed the Assessee to participate in adjudicating mechanism-Order of single judge is affirmed in appeal. [S. 92C, 92D, 92E, 148, Art. 226]

S. 148 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded not communicated-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 147, 292BB]

S. 147 : Reassessment-Unexplained money-Enforcement Directorate without making any independent inquiry himself into matter-Borrowed satisfaction-Reassessment was held to be not valid. [S. 69A]

S. 147 : Reassessment-Business expenditure-Loss on bidding deduction-Tribunal quashed the reassessment on the ground that there was no failure on the part of assessee to disclose all material facts-High court quashed the order of Tribunal and remanded the matter back to Tribunal to decide on merit afresh. [S. 37(1)), 148]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-When re-assessment proceedings to disallow brought forward loss were held to be without jurisdiction, High Court could not issue fresh directions to Assessing Officer to look into other grounds. [S.72, Art. 226]