Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Rajesh Passi v .ITO (2020)78 ITR 221 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment – Service tax – Amount neither paid nor added in computation of income.

Darashaw and Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 553 ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction – Transactions in Derivatives in Futures and Options segments of National Stock Exchange — Marked to Market Loss — Not to be assessed speculative loss .

Avaya India Pvt. Ltd. v .Add. CIT (2020)78 ITR 305 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Car lease rentals – Directed to furnish evidence that whether the payee had shown receipts as their income . [ S.37(1) ]

A. K. Industries v .ACIT (2020)78 ITR 462 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Short deduction of tax at source – No disallowance can be made .[ S.194C ]

Torrence Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 96 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure – Revised return — Claim of assessee acceptable with regard to expenditure involved as allowable expenditure — Disallowance is held to be not valid . [ S.139(1) ]

Royal Challengers Sports Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 577 (Bang) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure — Contribution to State Cricket Association to create cricket academy —Getting first right to recruit players from academy to play for assessee — Allowable as business expenditure .

Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2020)78 ITR 398 (Chennai ) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure — Local area expenses and pooja expenses in temples outside factory — Onus on assessee to prove nexus with business – Provision for profit incentive payable to employees -Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer .

Avinash Shaw v. ITO (2020)78 ITR 617 (Kol) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure -Driver’s salary and fuel and lubricant expenses —Disallowance of fifty Per Cent is restricted to twenty Per Cent. — Conference expenses — Flight booking expenses —Deductible.

Arvindkumar K. Patel v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 625 (Ahd) (Trib)

S.37(1): Business expenditure — Land levelling charges — Held to be allowable expenditure

Arvindkumar K. Patel v. Dy. CIT (2020)78 ITR 625 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 36(1)(vii) :Bad debt -Mere write off in the books of account is sufficient compliance – Not required to justify the irrecoverability of the amount from the debtors.