Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Asian Consolidated Industries Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 114 taxmann.com 105 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed Dy.CIT v. Asian Consolidated Industries Ltd. (2020) 270 Taxman 184 (SC)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Amount received from sister concern in a running account were held not to constitute as an infraction under Section 269SS-Tribunal should have remanded matter back-Order of penalty was set aside. [S. 254(1), 269SS]

PCIT v. Sahara India Financial Corpn. Ltd. (2020) 119 taxmann.com 284 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Sahara India Financial Corpn. Ltd. (2020) 274 Taxman 214 (SC)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Depositors belonged to rural areas where adequate banking facilities were not available-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 269SS]

Vikas Bhatnagar v. ITO (2020) 120 taxmann.com 461 (AP)(HC) Editorial : SLP of assessee is dismissed, Vikas Bhatnagar v. ITO (2020) 275 Taxman 594(SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Writ against penalty order is not maintainable when the quantum addition is in challenge before Appellate Authorities. [S. 144, 271(1))(b), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Ashok Kumar Maneklal Parikh (2020) 120 taxmann.com 268 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Ashok Kumar Maneklal Parikh (2020) 274 Taxman 457 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Not declared capital gain arising from sale of leasehold rights-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 45, 54EC]

PCIT v. National Diary Development Board (2020) 114 taxmann.com 553 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed PCIT v. National Diary Development Board (2020) 270 Taxman 6 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Disallowance of claim-Appeal pending before High Court-Reasonable explanation-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 36 (1)(iii)]

PCIT v. Prabhjot Kaur Chhabra (Smt.) (2020) 113 taxmann.com 140 (MP) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Prabhjot Kaur Chhabra (Smt.) (2020) 269 Taxman 34 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Capital gain not shown in original return-Revised return prior to issue of notice u/s. 153C of the Act-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S.45, 133A, 153C]

PCIT v. Financial Technologies Ltd. (2019) 112 taxmann.com 398 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Financial Technologies Ltd (2020) 269 Taxman 32 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Depreciation withdrawn during subsequent search proceedings-Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 32, 132(4), 153A]

PCIT v. Basanti Properties (P.) Ltd. (2020) 114 taxmann.com 540 (Cal.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect, PCIT v. Basanti Properties (P.) Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 573 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Unless while issuing notice under section 271, read with section 274, no details of any charge were provided penalty cannot be levied [S. 274]

PCIT v. Synbiotics Ltd (2019) 112 taxmann.com 399 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Synbiotics Ltd (2020) 269 Taxman 50(SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Sale of land-Levy of penalty was held to be not justified.

CIT v. Hiralal Amritlal Parekh & Co. (2020) 117 taxmann.com 125 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : Revenue was granted two weeks time to refile SLP and, in case of revenue’s failure to do so, SLP would be treated as dismissed for non-prosecution CIT v. Hiralal Amritlal Parekh & Co. (2020) 272 Taxman 96 (SC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Mercantile method of accounting-Recovery of loan was doubtful-Interest has shown as income-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 145]