Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Peerless General Finance & Investment Company Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 87 ITR 281 / 211 TTJ 823 / 203 DTR 103 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Order of Assessing Officer was in consonance with the view taken by the Tribunal, revision order was quashed. [S. 2(14), 2(29A)(2)(47), 251]

Altmash Exports v. PCIT (2021) 87 ITR 22 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-remuneration to working partners-as per partnership deed, remuneration is paid as per the provisions of s. 40(b)(v) and taxed at 30% in the hands of individual partner, same as the assessee firm-Assessment order framed is not erroneous and there is no prejudice to the interest of revenue. [S. 40(b)(v)]

Goldman Sachs Services Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 187 ITD 488 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Paid more than 51 percent of disputed tax-Stay granted. [S. 201(1), 254(1)]

Dy.CIT v. Sanjay Singal (2021) 87 ITR 468/(2022) 217 TTJ 18 (Chd.)(Trib.) Dy.CIT v. Aarti Singal (Smt.) (2021) 87 ITR 468 / (2022) 217 TTJ 18(Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-No power to review its own order.

Solaron Sustainability Services Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (CPC) TDS (2021) 87 ITR 28 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Delay in filing an appeal before CIT (A)-Wrong advice-Delay of more than 1213 days was condoned-Remanded to the office of CIT (A) to decide on merit. [S. 234E, 250]

Trimurti Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 505 / 211 TTJ 249/(2022) 209 DTR 322 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 251 : Powers of Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers of enhancement-Commissioner has no power of enhancement, in respect of Matter which do not arise from the order of assessment, or are out of the proceedings before the AO. [S. 36(1)(iii)]

Uber India Systems (P) Ltd. v. JCIT (2021) 188 ITD 362 / 211 TTJ 1 / 202 DTR 129 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 194C : Deduction at source-Contractors-Person responsible for paying-It’s the user who is person responsible for paying, and not the intermediary-Intermediary in the instant case is an ‘aggregator’ and not a service provider and hence cannot be treated as assessee in default. [S. 201(1), 201(IA), 204]

Kachhi Heritage v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 335 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 184 : Firm-Registration-Partnership deed on lesser value stamp paper-Remuneration paid to partners cannot be disallowed and firm cannot be assessed as an AOP.

Aerens Infrastructure & Technology (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 699 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 158BC : Block assessment-Agricultural income disclosed prior to search-Addition cannot be made. [S. 158BB]

Dy. CIT v. Aadyant Education Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 18 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153C : Search and seizure-assessment of third person-setting aside assessment order on ground of lack of jurisdiction for failure by assessing officer of person in respect of who search conducted to record satisfaction note. Department challenged on merits of assessment without challenging jurisdiction. Appeal not maintainable. [S. 153A]