Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Frontiner Land Development P. Ltd. (2020) 270 Taxman 63 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Real estate business-Forfeiture of advance-Allowable as business expenditure. [S. 28(i), 45]

CIT v. Acurus Solutions (P) Ltd. (2020) 275 Taxman 17 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 268A : Appeal-Monetary limit-Audit objection-Dismissal of appeal on account of below monetary limit is held to be not valid. [S. 254(1)]

CIT v. Anna Poorna Re-Rolling (P) Ltd. (2020) 275 Taxman 36 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 268A : Appeal-Lower than monetary limit fixed by Circular-Appeal was less than monetary limit of Rs. 10 lakhs fixed by CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, dated 10-12-2015.

CIT v. Rudra Blades and Edges (P.) Ltd. (2020) 275 Taxman 364 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 268A : Appeal-Monetary limit-Lower than monetary limit fixed by Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11-7-2018-Appeal was same was dismissed. [S. 80IB(10), 271(1)(c)]

CIT v. Chemsworth (P) Ltd. (2020) 275 Taxman 408 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-AO had taken a plausible view-Merely on ground that enquiry conducted by AO was inadequate revision is held to be not valid. [S. 14A]

CIT v. Rajmahal Silk (2020) 275 Taxman 150 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Transportation charges-cryptic order-Matter remanded. [S. 37 (1)]

Reena Agarwal v. UOI (2020) 275 Taxman 596 (Gauhati)(HC)

S. 249 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Form of appeal and limitation-Condonation of delay of four months-Pendency of rectification application-Matter remanded to the file of the CIT(A). [S. 154, 250, Art. 226]

Pesco Beam Environmental Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 275 Taxman 211 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 249 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Payment of admitted tax-Unless and until, assessee has paid income tax due on income returned by him, no appeal under Chapter XX will be admitted. [S. 249(4)(b)]

P.R. Ganapathy v. CIT (2020) 275 Taxman 279 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Tax deducted by employer-Appellate Authorities have held that tax was not liable to be deducted-Entitle refund with interest. [S. 244A(1)(a)]

DIT(IT) v. Texas Instruments Incorporated (2020) 275 Taxman 614 (Kern.)(HC)

S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax-Non-Resident-Levy of interest is not liable. [S. 195]