Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Vodafone M-Pesa Ltd . v. DCIT (2020) 181 ITD 242 (Mum) (Trib.)

S.56: Income from other sources – Market value of shares -Share premium- Discount cash flow method (DCF ) –Valuation by merchant banker – Revenue authorities cannot evaluate accuracy of valuation at time of assessment-Addition was deleted .[ 56(2)(viib) , R.IIUA ]

Mohammadanif Sultanali Pradhan. v. DCIT (2020) 181 ITD 238 / 194 DTR 348 / 207 TTJ 1128 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S.54F : Capital gains- Investment in a residential house -Two bungalows located adjacent to each other and used as one residential unit – Entitle to exemption [ S. 45 ]

Ravi Jalan. v. DCIT (2020) 181 ITD 284 / 193 DTR 175/ 207 TTJ 38(Kol) (Trib.)

S. 47(xiv) : Capital gains – Transaction not regarded as transfer – Sole proprietary concern succeeded by a company – Full value of consideration received on sale were same figure, no capital gains had accrued or were received- Capital gains cannot be levied- Provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(c) are not applicable when subject matter of transfer is immovable property. [ S.45 56(2)(vii) (c ) Rule 11U ]

Swati Luthra v. ITO (2019) 76 ITR 432 / (2020) 181 ITD 603 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S.45: Capital gains- Sale of shares – STT paid – Sale of shares through a registered share broker in a recognised stock exchange – Addition cannot be made as cash credits – Entitle to exemption [ S.10(38) 68 ]

New Kalpana Ent Udyog v. ITO (2020) 181 ITD 507 (Agra) (Trib.)

S. 40A(3) :Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits – Truck drivers and agents – After banking hours at a village there was no banking facilities – Disallowance is held to be not justified [ R.6DD ]

Nokia India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 181 ITD 645 /114 taxmann.com 442 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Principal to Principal- Supply of cellular mobile phones, benefit extended to distributors could not be treated as commission liable for withholding tax under S, 194H or u/s 194J of the Act . [ S.194H, 194J ]

JCIT v. Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank. (2020) 181 ITD 672 / 79 ITR 207 (Bang) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Interest other than interest on securities -Form 15G/15H- Procedural defects – Disallowance is held to be not justified .[ S.194A, Form No 15G/15H ]

Inter Globe Aviation Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 181 ITD 225/ 194 DTR 81/ 207 TTJ 191 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Provision for expenses – Specific provision ascertained amount – Liable to deduct tax at source [ S.37(1) 145 ]

Peerless Hospitex Hospital & Research Centre Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 181 ITD 446/ 196 DTR 57/ 207 TTJ 300 (Kol) (Trib.)

S.37(1): Business expenditure – Referral fees – Hospital, paid referral fee to doctors for referring their patients to assessee’s hospital- Regulations of Indian Medical Council was not applicable to pharmaceutical company or allied health sector industries- Entitled to deduction

Nokia India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 181 ITD 645 /114 taxmann.com 442 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S.37(1): Business expenditure -Trade Price Protection (TPP) extended to distributors for reduction in prices of products having been incurred wholly and exclusively for business, would be allowable as revenue expenditure