S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Subject matter of appeal-Revised return-CIT (A) dismissed the appeal on the ground that the admitted tax was not paid–Rejection of revision application was held to be not justified-Matter remanded. [S. 246, Art. 226]
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Dismissal petition as premature without giving any reasons-Matter remanded and directed to pass a reasoned order. [Art. 226]
S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Return filed and assessed as resident-Scope is narrower than appeal-Revision application made to be assessed as Non-resident-Writ is not maintainable-Circular and Act-In case of conflict of provisions of Act will prevail. [S. 2(42), 6(1)(a), 144, 147, 154, Art. 226]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Unexplained investment-Un secured loans-Enquires were made in detail-Plausible view-Explanation 2-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 68, 69]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Depreciation-Two possible view-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 32]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Two possible view-Interest on fixed deposit-Order of revision is not valid. [S.143(3)]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Search and seizure-Undisclosed investment-Excess stock assessed as business income-Possible view-Revision order held to be not justified. [S. 69, 115BBE, 132, 153D, 260A]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Search and seizure-Undisclosed investment-Excess stock assessed as business income-Possible view-Revision order held to be not justified. [S. 69, 115BBE, 132, 153D, 260A]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limitation-Order to be made within two years-Order passed and dispatched with in two years-Received the copy of order after eight months-Order is valid-Date of receipt is not relevant-Interpretation of taxing statute-The provision of the statute are to be as they are and nothing is to be added or taken away from the provisions of the statute. [S. 263(2)]
S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-No power of review-Rejection of application was held to be valid. [S. 254(1), 260A, Art. 226]