Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Jayant Packaging (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 189 ITD 321 (Chenni)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Factory shifting expenditure-Transportation expenditure from one site to another site, did not give any enduring benefit, same could not be treated as capital in nature.

Jaipur Boutique Carpet v. ITO (2021) 189 ITD 305 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Commission-AO failed to considered the letter submitted by recipient wherein confirmed that entire commission paid was for relevant assessment year, matter needs remanded for consideration. [S.254(1)]

Muneer Enterprises v. ACIT (2021) 189 ITD 7/ 213 TTJ 361/ 205 DTR 241 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Penal in nature-Contributed 15 per cent of sale proceeds to SPV account, these payment did not fall under category of penalty-Allowable as deduction. [Explanation 1 to section 37 (1)]

Golf view Homes Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 212 TTJ 472 / 88 ITR 423 / 207 DTR 199(Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Acquisition of capital asset is not an extension of existing business-Advance less than available free funds-Interest cannot be disallowed. [S. 37(1)]

Archana Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 189 ITD 626 / 214 TTJ 231 / 206 DTR 393 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 28(iv) : Business income-Value of any benefit or perquisites-Forfeiture of advance money-Benefit or perquisite arising from the business shall not be in monetary form-Not taxable-Amount would go to reduce the cost of property. [S. 51]

Pricewaterhouse Coopers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 189 ITD 329 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 28 (iv) : Business income-Grant received for specific purpose i.e., for procuring a capital asset, this receipt being in cash could not have been taxed u/s. 28(iv) [S.4]

Kumar Properties and Real Estate (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 190 ITD 212 / 87 ITR 169 (SN)/ 212 TTJ 227/ 202 DTR 425 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 23 : Income from house property-Annual value-Unsold flat as stock in trade-buildings or land appurtenant thereto-Occupied by owners for the purpose of business-Excluded for the purpose of computing notional rent. [S. 22]

Pricewaterhouse Coopers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 189 ITD 329 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Disallowance is restricted to extent of exempt income. [R.8D]

Navajbai Ratan Tata Trust v. PCIT (2021) 189 ITD 535 / 88 ITR 170 / 210 TTJ 921 / 200 DTR 9 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 12A : Charitable or religious trust-Registration-Cancellation of registration-Assessee unwilling to avail benefit of registration obtained u/s. 12A cannot be bound to, by action of or by inaction of revenue authorities, continue with said registration-Benefit could not be forced upon the assesseee. [S. 12A(3), 13(1)(d)]

Acharya Jiyalal Vasant Sangeet Niketan v. ITO(E) (2021) 189 ITD 1 / 211 TTJ 655 / 200 DTR 289 (SMC) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Rental income derived from letting out studio to artists for teaching Indian classical music comes within the ambit of “education”-Assessee is entitled to exemption. [S. 2(15), 11(4A)]