Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Vijaykumar Satramdas Lakhani v. CBDT ( 2020) 195 DTR 121/ 317 CTR 249/ (2021) 276 Taxman 470 ( Bom) (HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 197 : Deduction at source – Certificate for lower rate – Order of rejection application was quashed – An ordinance made by the President is not an executive act- Power to promulgate ordinance is legislative in nature.-Directed the Assessing officer to decide the application on merit with in period of six weeks . [Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 , S 3, S. 119 , Art , 226 ]

Sindhu Cargo Services Pvt. Ltd v. Dy.CIT ( Bang) (Trib) www.itatonline .org

S. 143(2) : Assessment – Notice – Beyond the period of limitation – Order passed is held to be bad in law . [ S.139(9) ]

Chhaya B. Parekh (Ms) v.CIT ( Bom) (HC) www.itatonline.org

S.54F : Capital gains- Investment in a residential house -Claim of exemption cannot be denied even though the House property which the assessee had purchased as co-¬owner had been
demolished before completing 3 years of purchase and no new house property was constructed.-Does not violate section 54F(3) of the Act. [ S. 2(47) 45, 54F(3) ]

Benedicta Mary Mendonce ( Ms.) v ITO ( Bang ) (Trib) www.itatonline .org

S. 45 : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Valuation report of DVO was less than the stamp valuation – Valuation report given by the DVO cannot be ignored and directs that the value as determined by the DVO be adopted for the purpose of determining the full value of consideration received on transfer of capital asset for computing LTCG as laid down in S..50C(3) of the Act [ S.50C(2)(b) , 50C(3) ]

Vaduganathan Talkies v. ITO ( 2020) 428 ITR 224/275 Taxman 599 ( Mad ) (HC)/ Lena Talkies v. ITO( 2020) 428 ITR 224/ 275 Taxman 599 ( Mad ) (HC)

S. 40A(3) :Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits – Commercial expediency – Not eligible deduction [ R.6DD ]

PCIT v. V .Hotels Ltd 429 ITR 54/ 275 Taxman 106/ 317 CTR 377 / 194 DTR 369 ( Bom) (HC) ( Bom) (HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 32 : Depreciation – Rate of depreciation – FSI – Intangible asset-FSI purchased from Government of Maharashtra- held eligible for depreciation at the rates applicable to the Building @ 10% and not to Intangible assets @ 25% [ S.32(1)(ii), 43(6)(c ) ]

J. Stephen v. ITO ( 2018) 256 Taxman 172 / (2020)425 ITR 561 (Mad) (HC)

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court -Dismissal of appeal on grounds of delay in fling of appeal – Cash credits -No substantial question of law [ S .68 254(1) ]

PCIT v. City Centre Mall Nashik Pvt. Ltd. (2020) 424 ITR 85 / 121 taxmann.com 87(Bom)(HC)

S.28(i):Business — Income from house property —Object of developing commercial complexes —Income earned assessable as business income [ S.22 ]

CIT(TDS) v Jeevan Telecasting Corporation Ltd (2018) 171 DTR 145 / 305 CTR 1001/ (2020)423 ITR 496 (Ker)(HC)

S.254(1) : Appellate Tribunal — Powers- Remand – Deduction at source – The Tribunal being the fact finding authority ought to look into the facts before ordering a remand on the basis of the directions issued by the Supreme Court. [ S. 194J , 201(1) 271C ]

PCIT v. Ashok Apparels (P.) Ltd (2019) 264 Taxman 50 / (2020)423 ITR 412 (Bom) (HC)

S.45: Capital gains — Transfer of bonus shares — Bonus shares in respect of shares held as stock-in-trade — No presumption that bonus shares constituted stock-in-trade — Tribunal justified in treating bonus shares as investments [ S.28(i) ]