Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kotyala Sujatha (Smt) v. ITO (2024)110 ITR 12 (SMC) (SN) (Vishakha)(Trib)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Unexplained investments-Survey-Payment made to vendor under Registered sale-cum-General power of Attorney agreements-Amounts received as advances from 30 Persons-Only part of sum confirmed-Agreeing to addition of balance as unexplained investment-Vendor unilaterally cancelled all General Power of attorney-cum-sale agreements by registered cancellation deeds and took back possession of property on ground that he had not received any consideration from assessee-Registered cancellation of sale deed is not valid without decree of Civil Court Rejection of rectification application is valid.[S.69,133A, Specific Relief Act, 1963, S. 31, 32, 33, Registration Act, 1908,]

Orient Craft Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 622 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Intimation-Appeal against intimation withdrawn on ground return selected for scrutiny-Regular assessment on scrutiny made without taking into account disallowances proposed in intimation-Rectification order in respect of delayed deposit of employee contributions to the provident fund and employees Stat Insurance-Change of law-No merger of orders passed under intimation and regular assessment-Rectification is proper.[S.143(1), 143(3)]

Ravi Badalia v. Dy. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 329/228 TTJ 291 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Unabated assessment-No incriminating material found during search-Addition based on loose sheets is unsustainable.[S. 132, 132(4), 153A]

Poonam Promoters And Developers P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024)110 ITR 28 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-No incriminating material is found-Addition is deleted. [S. 148]

Khanna Infrabuild P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 161 / 227 TTJ 97 / 233 DTR 17 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Cost of construction of hotel building-Original assessment completed and not abated on date of search-No incriminating material is found-Reference to Departmental valuation officer is not valid-Addition is deleted-Cost of construction of hotel building prior to commencement of hotel business-Capital invested by shareholders-Addition is deleted. [S. 69, 132, 143(2)]

Bee Pee Rollers P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 402 (Cuttack) (Trib) Bajrangbali Re-Rollers P.Ltd v. Asst. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 402 (Cuttack) (Trib) Bajrangbali Steel Industries P.Ltd v. Asst. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 402 (Cuttack) (Trib)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Bogus purchases and sales-No evidence was found during search or in course of assessment proceedings to prove sellers and buyers bogus-Profit estimated on unproved purchases and 5 Per Cent. profit on unproved sales is held to be not proper.[S.69C]

PNK Space Development P. Ltd. v ITO (2024)110 ITR 71 (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Accommodation entries-Information based on search action-Reassessment is valid-Depreciation-Disallowance is justified-Income from undisclosed sources-Addition is justified. [S. 32(1)(ii), 143(1), 148]

Mobase India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (NEAC) (2024)110 ITR 55 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Eligible assessee-Draft assessment order-Assessing Officer in final order not empowered to make any other addition not proposed in draft assessment order. [S. 144C(1), 144C(5), 114C(13)]

Automation Anywhere Inc. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024)110 ITR 46 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Non-Resident-Permanent Establishment-Matter remanded to DRP-DTAA-India-USA [S. 143(3), Art. 5(4)]

Marriott International Inc. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024) 110 ITR 714 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Eligible assessee-Draft assessment order-Assessing Officer passing final assessment without passing a draft assessment order-Final assessment order invalid.[S.144C(13)]