S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-International Transactions-Eligible assessee-Remand by Tribunal with direction to consider additional ground raised by assessee-Assessing Officer passing final assessment order without passing order is void ab initio.[S. 254(1)]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Limitation-Eligible assessee-Directions of Dispute Resolution Panel-Date of uploading of order of Panel on ITBA Portal is deemed date of receipt by National E-Assessment Centre-Limitation to be reckoned from that date-Due date for framing final assessment order not automatically extended-Barred by limitation. [S.130, 144B(5) 144B(6)((v), 144C(13), Information Technology Act, 2000, S. 13]

S. 143(3): Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-Sundry creditors-No discrepancy in purchase of gods or payment-Purchases and sales accepted-Entire addition of opening balance in sundry creditors is deleted. [S.133(6), 143(2)]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Protective assessment-Lack of confirmation from parties sourcing funds for land purchase-Subsequent substantive assessment in hands of payers becoming final-Addition of same amount in hands of assessee is invalid.[S.69C, 153A]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Search And Seizure-Unexplained cash credits-Creditworthiness, genuineness and identity proved-No evidence available for creditors in other assessment years from 2014-15 to 2018-19-Additions are deleted.[S.68, 132]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Additional ground-Notice issued by Assessing Officer not having required Jurisdiction-Assessment order is quashed.[S. 143(3)]

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Prima facie adjustments-Additional ground-Appellate Tribunal-Additional ground is admitted-Assessing Officer is duty-bound to intimate either in writing or in Electronic mode before making any adjustment or disallowance to returned income-No intimation is given-Order is quashed. [S.254(1)

S. 139 : Return of income-Carry forward of loss-Return is filed within time-CIT(A) is recording wrong date-The Assessing Officer is directed to carry forward the loss. [S.139(1), 139(4), 139(5)]

S. 133A :Power of survey-Statement in the course of survey-Bogus purchases-Statement was retracted within six days-Assessment based solely upon statement of one partner could not be sustained-Without rejecting books of account no addition can be made as bogus purchases-The acceptance by the assessee of the addition in one assessment year could not lead to a conclusion that in all these assessment years, the assessee had inserted bogus purchases in a similar way-Reassessment is valid. [S. 131, 131(IA),133, Evidence Act, 1878, S 31]

S. 133A : Power of survey-Copy of statement recorded was not furnished-Opportunity of cross examination-Matter restored To Assessing Officer for re adjudication after granting assessee adequate opportunity to cross-examine director.