Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Atomstroyexport. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 767 /115 ITR 30 (SN) (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 44BBB : Foreign companies-Civil construction-Turnkey power projects-Offshore supply contracts-Business profits-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Contracts were carried out and concluded outside India, income received from offshore supply contracts would not be taxable in India-DTAA-India-Russia. [S. 9(1)(i), Art. 7]

Ganesh Ores (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 114 / 232 TTJ 490 (Cuttack)(Trib.)

S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction-Loss from derivative transaction-Speculative transaction-Matter is restored to Assessing Officer to specifically examine same whether derivatives had been dealt with by assessee and whether such derivatives were transacted through recognised stock exchange as defined in section 43(5)(d).-Cash credits-Matter remanded. [S.43(5)(d), 43(5)(e)]

Western Outdoor Interactive (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 608 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Export commission-Sales, marketing and customer support services rendered outside India by foreign agents-Cannot be treated as Fees for technical services-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-Korea.[S.9(1)(vii): Art. 13]

QAI India Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 242 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Software training services outside India-Not required to deduct tax at source-OECD Model Convention, Article 12. [S. 9(1)(vii)(b), 195]

Meenawala Castings. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 684 (Rajkot) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Robbery-Theft-Embezzlement-Business of gold-Loss arising from robbery-Incidental to normal business-Allowable as deduction. [S.28(i)]

Chalasani Hospitals (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 410/232 TTJ 667 (Visakha) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Advertisement expenditure-Hospital-Unethical acts-Violation of provisions of Indian Medical Council Act, (professional conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002-Not allowable as deduction.

Saurashtra Gramin Bank. v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 55 /[2025] 121 ITR 417/ 233 TTJ 579 (Rajkot) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provisions for gratuity and leave encashment-Accounting Standard-15-Claimed only actual payment made to employees-Not to be reduced earlier year provisions from current profit and loss account.[S. 145]

Diamour Jewels (P.) Ltd v. CPC (2024) 208 ITD 189/232 TTJ 389 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(va): Any sum received from employees-COVID-19-Delay in depositing the amount-EPF Organisation had waived levy of penal damages for delayed payment during lockdown-Disallowance is deleted. [S.43B]

ACIT v. Lyka Labs Ltd. (2024) 208 ITD 532 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 28(va) : Business income-Cash or kind-Under an agreement-Non-compete fee-Joint venture company-Negative covenant-Loss of source of income-Capital receipt-Finance Act, 2002, with effect from 1-4-2003 applicable only after the assessment year 2003-04. [S. 4]

Heena Gems v. ACIT (2024) 208 ITD 481 /114 ITR 30 (SN) (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Embezzlement of stock by an employee-FIR is filed-Loss is allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1), 145]