Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 103 ITR 67 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Initial assessment year-If depreciation is allowed in the initial year, the claim cannot be disturbed in the subsequent years.

Muwahhid Educational Foundation v. CIT(A) (2023) 103 ITR 26 (SN) (Bang) (Trib)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Income wrongly shown under the head income from other sources instead of business income-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 10(23C) (iii)(ad), 28(i), 56]

Addl.CIT v. Quippo Oil & Gas Infrastructure Ltd. (Delhi) 201 ITD 47(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 32: Depreciation —Oil drilling rigs-Entitled to a higher rate of depreciation. [R. 5]

Nalini Mahajan (Mrs.) v. ACIT (2023) 201 ITD 328 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 28(va) : Business income-Cash or kind-Under an agreement-Non-compete fees-Capital or revenue-Non-compete fees received for the period prior to AY 20217-18 are to be treated as capital receipts and not to be charged under S. 28(va). [S.4]

Charuben Jitendrarai Mehta and Bimal Jitendra Mehta v .ITO (2023) 103 ITR 29 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib) Bimal Jitendra Mehta v .ITO (2023) 103 ITR 29 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Survey-Client code modification-Information from Investigating agency-Loss in share trading-Misuse of client code modification to book losses to evade tax-Failure of the assessee to establish that he was not involved in Client Code Modification-Disallowance of loss is justified. [S.133A, 148]

Wieden+Kennedy India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 63 (SN.) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Business expenditure-Money embezzled by director-CIT(A) accepted loss but denied deduction for want of details-AO to verify recovery and allow balance of loss.[S. 37(1)]

ITO v.Champalal Gopiram Agarwal (2023)101 ITR 22 (SN.)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 28(i): Business loss-Purchase and sale of shares-Scripts manipulated by third parties-No adverse findings against assessee-Assessee made transactions in good faith-Loss not bogus-Loss allowed.

Dy. CIT v. Connect Residuary P. Ltd. (2023) 105 ITR 46 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business Income-Deduction of tax at source-Difference between receipts stated in form 26AS and income shown in profit and loss account cannot be brought to tax in the hands of the assessee.[S. 145, Form No 26AS]

Dy. CIT v. G. G. Continental Traders (P.) Ltd. [2023] 201 ITD 440 (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Interest on FDRs-Pledge fixed deposit receipts (FDRs) as margin with the bank-Interest income assessable as business income-High sea sale.[S.43(5)]

Hanuman Plantations Ltd. v. ITO (2023)104 ITR 78 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Agricultural income-Apportionment AO is directed to recompute disallowance and only 40% amount to be added to business income. [S. 2(24)(x), 36(1))(v),R. 8(1)]