Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ajay Sharma v. Jt. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 268 (Amritsra)(Trib)

S. 251: Appeal -Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers- Co-terminus -Fresh claim of deduction- Allowed deduction. [S.80C]

DSI-Bridgecon India (P.) ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 205 ITD 136 (Delhi) (Trib)

S.251: Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals) -Powers -No power to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution –CIT(A) is directed to pass speaking order on merits. [S. 92C, 92CA(2)]

Dy. CIT v. Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 689 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 201 : Deduction at source – Failure to deduct or pay -DTAA -India -UAE.[S. 9(1)(vi), 201(1), 201(IA), Art. 7]

BASF Catalysts India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 668 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 195 :Deduction at source – Non-resident – Other sums – Reimbursement of cost- Matter remanded -DTAA -India -Germany. [S. 9(1)(vii),197, 248]

Dy. CIT v. Foundation Co. of Canada Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 590 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 195: Deduction at source – Non-resident – Other sums – Resident of Canada entitled to benefit under DTAA -DTAA -India -Canada.[S.195(2), Art.]

Kawaljit Singh v. ACIT (2024) 204 ITD 307 (Chd)(Trib)

S.153A: Assessment -Search -Less than 50 lakhs -Assessment beyond six years is bad in law. [S.69, 132]

Chirag Mishrimal Hirani v. Dy. CIT [2024] 109 ITR 40 (SN) (Surat)(Trib)

S.151 : Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Sanction for issue of notice -The absence of proper authorization from the designated officer renders the notice of reassessment under section 148 null and void from the outset, warranting its dismissal.[S. 127, 147, 148]

Dinesh Gangwal v. ITO [2024] 109 ITR 42 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment -Borrowed satisfaction- The reopening of an assessment solely on borrowed satisfaction, devoid of independent scrutiny, lacks validity.[S. 148]

Ujjala Suppliers P. Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 109 ITR 16 (SN)(Kol)(Trib)

S.147: Reassessment – Information from investigation wing -Borrowed satisfaction -Cash deposits -Reassessment order is set aside. [S. 143(3), 148]

Dy. CIT v. Satya Securities Ltd. [2024] 109 ITR 700 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – No failure to disclose material facts -Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 148 149(1)(b)]