Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Shashi Jain. (Smt.) v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 33/225 TTJ 577 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limited scrutiny-Purchase of residential property was entered by parties in AY 2008-09 even for consideration lower than market price, provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b) would not be applicable as it came into existence from 1-10-2009-Revision order is quashed.[S. 56(2)(vii)(b)]

Asian Box Corporation. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 269 (Rajkot) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Income from other sources-Expenditure claimed-Allowability of interest-Verified in the course of original assessment proceedings-Revision order is quashed.[S.36(1)(iii), 56, 57]

Bajaj Finance Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 656 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Method of accounting-Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS)-Accrual-NBFC Governed by RBI was not required to recognize its accrued interest on NPAs as income on accrual basis, provisions of ICDS would not be applicable

Bhikhabhai Rajabhai Dhameliya. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 424 /225 TTJ 1104 (Surat) (Trib.)/Dakshben Shailesh Dhameliya v.PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 424 /225 TTJ 1104 (Surat) (Trib.)/Ravjibhai Becharbhai Dhamelia v.PCIT( 2023) 201 ITD 424 /225 TTJ 1104 (Surat) (Trib.

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Transfer of land used for agricultural purposes-Accepted the claim in another co-owner-Order is passed after [S. 54B]

Shankarlal Thakordas Narsingani. v. PCIT (2023) 201 ITD 845 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash deposited-Demonetization period-Assessing Officer has added 20 percent of sales as unexplained cash credits-Revision order is quashed. [S. 68]

DCIT v. Sumeet Industries Ltd. (2023) 201 ITD 154 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Impleaded as corporate debtor before NCLT by financial creditor-Petition is admitted-Pending proceedings before ITAT cannot be continued-Provisions of IBC would prevail over Income-tax Act.[S. 254(1), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S. 4, 31, 238]

Garden Silk Mills (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 201 ITD 68 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeals-Impleaded as corporate debtor before NCLT by financial creditor-Provisions of IBC would prevail over Income-tax Act-Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 254(1), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S.14, 31, 238]

Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. ITO (TDS) (2023) 201 ITD 695 (Indore) (Trib.)

S. 194H : Deduction at source-Commission or brokerage-Telecom services-Discount to distributors-Agreement is not considered-Matter remanded [S. 201]

Sawhney Builders (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (TDS) (2023) 201 ITD 259 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 194A : Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-Compensation /damage for delayed allotment of plot of land-Not interest not liable to deduct tax at source-Deduction of tax at source by mistake the assessee cannot be treated as assessee is default-Interest cannot be levied. [S. 2(28A), 133A, 201(1)]

Sanjay Kumar. v. ITO (2023) 201 ITD 837 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Delay in deposit of employees’ contribution-Order of rectification is not valid.[S. 36(1)(va). 143(1)]