Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Mehra Jewel Palace (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2024) 460 ITR 209/ 296 Taxman 489(Delhi)(HC)

S. 40A (2) : Expenses or payments not deductible—Excessive or unreasonable-Burden of proof on Revenue to show that expenditure was Excessive-The Assessing Officer is duty-bound to provide an opportunity to the assessee to place on record the requisite evidence to justify its claim Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer-Directed to issue fresh notice and decide in accordance with law. [S. 40A(2)(a)), 40A(2)(b), 260A]

PCIT v. PNB Housing Finance Ltd. (2023) 146 taxmann.com 445 / (2024) 461 ITR 476 (Delhi)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue dismissed , PCIT v. PNB Housing Finance Ltd [2024] 297 Taxman 229 / ] 461 ITR 481 (SC)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Business of retail lending as well as Long Term finance for construction of homes-Deduction claimed on interest on Long Term housing loan, which has been recalculated by the AO based on total receipt of the business-Rule of consistency is followed-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed.[S.260A]

PCIT v. PNB Housing Finance Ltd. (2023) 146 taxmann.com 445 / (2024) 461 ITR 476 (Delhi) (HC)/Editorial : SLP dismissed PCIT v. PNB Housing Finance Ltd., (2024) 297 Taxman 229 (SC)/[2024] 461 ITR 481 (SC)

S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Shares held as stock in trade-Dividend income earned-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed. [S.260A]

P CIT v. Times Internet Ltd [2023] 156 taxmann.com 577 / (2024)) 296 Taxman 547 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Depreciation-Rule of consistency followed-Appeal of Revenue is dismissed.[S. 32, R.8D]

Centre for Policy Research v. PCIT (Central) (2023) 156 taxmann.com 279 / (2024) 461 ITR 540 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Centre for Policy Research [2024] 297 Taxman 135 / 462 ITR 1 (SC)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration Cancellation of registration with retrospective effect-On writ filed by the petitioner, the Court granted the interim stay. [S. 12A, 12AA, 12AB(4), Art. 226]

CIT (IT) v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu(2023) 335 CTR 271/ (2024) 296 Taxman 104 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Subscription fee-From members Non-commercial objectives, professional practices, and articles did not reflect any element of commerciality, subscription fee would not be in nature of FTS-Also exempt on principle of mutuality-DTAA-India-Switzerland.[S.4, 260A, Art. 6.2(a), 6(2)(b), 7.5, 12]

CIT (IT) v. Nagravision S. A. (2023) 157 taxmann.com 457/ (2024) 461 ITR 143 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, CIT (IT) v. Nagravision S. A (2024) 297 Taxman 65/ 461 ITR 146 (SC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Income of supply of CAS and middleware products by the Switzerland company to Indian customers-Does not fall within the ambit of ‘royalty’ as defined in section 9(1)(vi) as well as DTAA-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-Switzerland [S.195, 260A, Art. 12(3) [

CIT (IT) v. Cobra Instalaciones Y Servicios S.A. (2024) 296 Taxman 287 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Business profits-Disallowed engineering fees on the ground that time log sheets were not filed, debit notes furnished provided sufficient information as to nature of duties and number of hours spent-Order of Tribunal deleting the disallowance is affirmed-Article 7 of OECD Model Convention. [S. 260A]

CIT (IT) v. Iljin Electric Co. Ltd (2024) 296 Taxman 516 (Bom)(HC)

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Business profits-Composite contract-Service rendered and payment received outside India-Income earned on account of offshore supplies was not taxable-DTAA-India-South Korea.[S. 234B,260A, Art. 7]

PCIT v. Wig Investment (2024) 461 ITR 117 / 158 taxmann.com 379 (Delhi HC)

S. 2(22)(e): Deemed dividend-Capital contribution by companies in which assessee Firm’s partners were shareholders-Commercial Transaction-Not loans and advances-Not assessable as deemed dividend. [S. 260A]