Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Shakuntala Devi (Smt.) v. CIT (2024)467 ITR 194 / 166 taxmann.com 601 (Raj)(HC)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Enterprises engaged in infrastructure development-Manufacture or production of GITTI from sand stone blocks-Amounts to manufacture or production.[S.80IB, 260A]

PCIT v. Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 467 ITR 270/300 Taxman 54 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Sundry credits and unsecured Loans-Responding to notice under Section 133(6) and confirming transactions through banks in their statements under Section 131-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S. 131, 133(6), 260A]

PCIT v. Divyaben Prafulchandra Parmar (2024) 467 ITR 146 (Guj)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long-term capital gains-Penny stock-Sunrise Asian Ltd-Exemption-Information from Investigation Wing-Presumptions is not corroborated by evidence-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed.[S. 10(38), 45, 115BBE, 133(6), 260A]

Ramesh Harbibhau Gawli v. ITO (2024)467 ITR 9 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, Ramesh Harbibhau Gawli v. ITO (2024)467 ITR 161 (SC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bogus expenses-Construction business-Payments made to Sub-contractors-TDS is deducted-Order of Tribunal confirming the disallowance is affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S.260A]

PCIT v.Century Real Estate Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (2024)467 ITR 13 /167 taxmann.com 220 (Karn)(HC) Editorial : Delay of 289 days in filing the SLP is not condoned, SLP is dismissed, PCIT v. Century Real Estate Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (2024)467 ITR 16 (SC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for contingent liabilities-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-No substantial question of law.[S. 260A]

Ramesh Harbibhau Gawli v. ITO (2024) 467 ITR 161 (SC) Editorial : Ramesh Harbibhau Gawli v. ITO (2024)467 ITR 9 (Bom)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bogus expenses-Construction business-Payments made to Sub-contractors-TDS is deducted-Order of Tribunal confirming the disallowance is affirmed-No substantial question of law-SLP of assessee is rejected. [Art. 136]

PCIT v.Century Real Estate Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (2024)467 ITR 16 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v.Century Real Estate Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (2024)467 ITR 13 /167 taxmann.com 220 (Karn)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for contingent liabilities-High Court affirmed the order of Tribunal-SLP of Revenue is dismissed for failure to condone delay of 289 days. [Art. 136]

PCIT v. Dharmanandan Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. (2024)467 ITR 31/ 64 300 Taxman 95 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Dharmanandan Diamonds (P.) Ltd. (2023) 294 Taxman 29/(2024)467 ITR 26 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Revaluation-Actual cost-Taken over assets and liabilities of the firm-Actual cost of assets will be actual cost which assessee paid to predecessor after revaluing assets-Entitled to claim depreciation for subsequent years on basis of actual cost paid-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 43(1), Proviso, R. 5, Art. 136]

PCIT v. ITC LTD. (2024)467 ITR 465 (Cal)(HC)

S.28(i):Business income-Capital or Revenue-Capital asset-Relinquishment in settlement agreement-Receipt on Arbitral Award-Difference between lease and licence-Trading and service agreement-No rights conferred except running hotel-Termination of agreement as result of settlement or compromise of all claims, counter-claims and disputes-Receipt on Arbitral Award on termination of agreement-Revenue receipt and not capital receipt.[S.2(14), 4, 45, 260A,Indian Easement Act, 1882 S. 52]

N. H. Kapadia Education Trust v. Asst. CIT(E) (2024) 467 ITR 278 (Guj)(HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Corpus fund-Corpus Donations-Securing admission-Tribunal is not justified in holding ineligible for exemption on corpus Fund.[S.11(1)(a), S. 11, Property held for charitable purposes.[S. 11(1)(d), 260A]