Black Money Act, 2015,

S. 50 : Punishment for failure to furnish return-Issuance of process-Inquiry under S. 202(1) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 mandatory where accused resides outside Magistrate’s jurisdiction-Court quashed the order and remanded the matter to the Magistrate for fresh consideration after complying with the procedure laid down in Section 202(1) of the Criminal Procedure [S 200 & 202(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, 200, 202(1)]

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Deletion of penalty by Tribunal-Criminal prosecution based on same facts not sustainable and is liable to be quashed. [S. 271(1)(c), 277, 278B, 278E]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bona fide claim for deduction-Disallowance arising from re computation of business profit by Assessing Officer does not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars. [S. 36(1)(viii)]

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Incorrect claim in law-Depreciation-Capital gains-Inaccurate particulars-Gain on depreciable asset wrongly claimed as long-term instead of short-term capital gain-Revised computation filed and tax paid before assessment order-Penalty not leviable. [S.32, 45,50, 139]

S. 268A : Appeal-Monetary limits-Enhanced monetary limits specified in Circular No. 9/2024 apply retrospectively to pending appeals, whereas exceptions introduced in Circular No. 5/2024 apply prospectively-A disallowance of expenditure under section 40(a)(i) in an assessment under section 143(3) is distinct from TDS proceedings under section 201 and is not covered by the TDS exception in Circular No. 5/2024. [S. 40(a)(i),. 143(3), 195, 201, 260A]

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Review jurisdiction-The power of review is circumscribed to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be exercised to re-hear an appeal on merits. [S. 115BBC, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S.114]

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal –Stay-Power to grant stay-Third proviso to Section 254(2A) limiting stay to 365 days regardless of fault for delay held illegal; Tribunal competent to extend stay where assessee not responsible for delay. [S. 254(1), 260A]

S. 254(2A): Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Extension beyond 365 days-Automatic vacation of stay under third proviso is inoperative where delay in disposal of appeal is not attributable to assessee. [S.260A]

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Condonation of delay of 1279 days-Tribunal has no power to condone delay beyond statutory period-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 254(1), Art. 226]