Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Aradhya Jain Trust v .ITO ( 2024) BCAJ – November – P. 47 ( Mum)( Trib)

S. 167B : Charge of tax – Shares of members unknown – Discretionary trust – Anti avoidance rule- Maximum rate of surcharge applicable in the case of an individual – This rate applies to a private discretionary trust as well . [ S. 2(29C) , 143(1) ]

ITO v. Petroleum Trust ( 2024) 165 taxmann.com 504 ( Mum)( Trib)

S. 161 : Liability of representative assessee – A determinate Trust with sole beneficiary is liable to be taxed at same rate as applicable to its beneficiary . [ S.115BAA , Form No -10IC ]

Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd v. ACIT ( 2024) BCAJ -April -P. 44 ( Bom)( HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Draft Assessment order – AO passed order unaware of the objection filed before DRP [ S. 144C(2), 144C(4), Art. 226 ]

Pasupati Acrylon Ltd v. ACIT (2024) BCAJ – October – P. 53 ( Delhi)( Trib)

S. 143(1) : Assessment – Intimation –Mandates only processing the return of income to vouch for the arithmetical error etc – Revenue cannot be allowed to go beyond – Claims not made in the return – Can proceed by filing revision application and not in appeal . [S. 37(1), 119, 264 , Form No .26AS ]

Food Corporation of India Employees Co -Operative Credit Society Ltd v. ADIT ,CPC ( 2024) BCAJ – June – P. 43 (Mum)( Trib)

S. 143(1) : Assessment – Intimation –Disallowance provision in section 143(1)(a) (v) , introduced by the Finance Act , 2021 , w.e.f Ist April , 2021 , dealing with deductions claimed under Chapter VI-A applies prospective . [ S. 143(1)(a)(v) ]

Smita Dilip Ghule v. CBDT (2024) BCAJ – December -P. 51 ( Bom)( HC)

S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes- Circular – Delay in filing of return – Posted during Covid 19 and death in family – Delay of 80 days in filing of return is condoned . [S.74, 119(2)(b) 139 Art. 226 ]

Shipra Estates Ltd & Jai Krishna Estate Developers Pvt Ltd v .ACIT (2024) BCAJ – July -P. 38 ( Delhi)( Trib)

S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects- The area of balconies open to sky is not to be considered as part of built -up area of a particular residential unit – Denial of exemption is not justified – Project completion method regularly followed cannot be rejected .[ S. 145 ]

Kamal Chand Sisodiya v.ITO ( 2024) 167 taxmann.com 671 ( Indore )( Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money -Frequent cash withdrawals and deposit – Only peak shortage could be added as unexplained under section 69A .

Deepak Setia v. Dy.CIT ( 2023) 106 ITR 125 ( Amritsar ) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money – Assessing the miscellaneous business income as income from other sources and applying the special rate as per section 115BBE is not justified . [ S. 115BBE ]

Ketan Prabhulal Dalsanaiya v .DCIT( 2024 ) BCAJ – May – P. 47 ( Rajkot)( Trib)

S. 64 : Clubbing of income – Spouse – Income returned and assessed in the hands of wife can not be again be taxed in the hands of the husband by invoking section. 64(1)(ii) of the Act . [ S. 64(1)(ii), 153A ]