Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT, Central v. Onehub Chennai Pvt. Ltd. [2025] 302 Taxman 497 (Delhi)(HC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Bogus expenses-Double taxation-Two constituent entities already offered to tax certain amounts out of receipts of aggregate amounts from assessee-Same amount not liable to be taxed in the hands of the assessee as it would amount to double taxation.[S. 260A]

CIT v. Desouza Hotels Ltd. (2025) 473 ITR 368 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 36(1)(vii) :Bad debt-It is sufficient for the debt to be written off as irrecoverable in the assessee’s accounts to be eligible for deduction, without the need to prove that the debt has actually become bad. [S. 36(2), 260A]

CIT v. Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P.) Ltd; (2025) 473 ITR 278 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 36(1)(vii): Bad debt-Payments made by a chit fund company to cover defaults by chit holders, ensuring the continuation of the chit cycle, can be treated as bad debts. [S. 37(1), 260A]

BPS Infrastructure v. ITO (2025) 473 ITR 357 (Chhattisgarh) (HC)

S. 36(1)(va) : Any sum received from employees-Employees’ contributions to PF and ESIC, made after the due date, was not allowable under section 36(1) (va) of the Income Tax Act-Delay of 690 days-No reasonable cause-Delay is not condoned. [S. 253, 260A]

CIT (IT) v. Fox Network Group Singapore Pte Ltd. (2024) 473 ITR 528 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Live sports telecast fees not royalty-No copyright in live feed-DTAA overrides domestic law-Income from live telecast is not assessable as royalty-DTAA-India-Singapore-Thailand. [Copyright Act, 1957, 2(y), 13, Art. 3]

Hyatt International Southwest Asia Ltd. v. Addl. DIT(2024) 166 taxmann.com 466 / (2025) 472 ITR 53 [FB] (Delhi) (HC)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Scope of total income-Taxation of income from permanent establishment-Effect of article 7 of India-United Arab Emirates Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement-Global income or profit irrelevant and not determinative-Article 7 does not expand its gaze or reach to overall operations or profitability of transnational enterprise-Activities of permanent establishment liable to be independently evaluated and ascertained-Article 7 does not restrict right of source State to allocate or attribute income to permanent establishment based on global income earned or loss incurred by cross border entity-DTAA-India-United Arab Emirates. [S. 5, Art. 5, 7]

PCIT v. Gravita Metal Inc. [2025] 302 Taxman 91 (J & K & L)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue-Income-Exemption from excise duty not under the purview of definition of income envisaged under S. 2(24)(xviii)-Such amount is thus not an income but capital receipt, not taxable under the Act-Entries in books of accounts not conclusive to determine income-No tax can be charged on an amount not actually earned.[S. 2(24)(xviii),5, 10, 145]

PCIT v. Jupiter Capital Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 472 ITR 561 (Karn.) (HC) Editorial : PCIT v. Jupiter Capital Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 472 ITR 616 /303 Taxman 95 (SC)

S. 2(47): Transfer-Capital loss-Reduction of share capital-loss due to reduction in number of shares pursuant to the court order-Change in redeemable value of shares amounts to extinguishment of rights in shares-No transfer within meaning of Section 2(47) of the Act. [S 45, 260A 1]

Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria v. CCIT (2025) 303 Taxman 415 /473 ITR 394 (SC) Editorial : Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria v. Chief CIT [2017] 247 Taxman 253/ (2025) 473 ITR 387 (Guj) (HC) (para 82) reversed. Prakash Nath Khanna v. CIT [2004] 135 Taxman 327/266 ITR 1 (SC) (para 44) followed.

S. 276CC: Offences and prosecutions-Failure to furnish return of income-First offence under compounding guidelines-Supreme Court allows compounding-Letter F. No. 285/35/2013 IT (INV.V)/108, dated 23-12-2014. [S. 119, 139(1),139(4), 139(8), 148, 153A, Guidelines for Compounding Offences, 2014,(2015) 371 ITR 7 (St), 279(2), Art. 136]

ITO (TDS) v. Aditya Institute of Technology and Management (2025) 472 ITR 638/170 taxmann.com 708 (SC) Editorial : Aditya Institute of Technology and Management v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2024) 471 ITR 262/ 163 taxmann.com 738 (AP) (HC). (para 4)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Failure to remit tax deducted at source in time to Central Government-Assessee furnishing supporting documents to show that delay was due to late receipt of fee reimbursement from state Government-Explanation for delay plausible and sufficient cause established-tax deducted at source deposited with interest for delay payment-Criminal proceedings quashed-Supreme Court-Special Leave Petition dismissed. [S. 278AA, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 482, Art. 136]