Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT (IT) v. Aecom Asia Company Ltd. (2023) 199 ITD 364 / 101 ITR 75 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 115A: Foreign companies-Tax-Dividends-Royalty-Technical services fees-Non-resident-Fees For Technical Services-Special rate of tax-Contract, right or property to be effectively connected-Fees for technical services taxable at special lower rate-The addition made under section 44DA of the Act is deleted.[S.44DA]

Atos India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 152 taxmann.com 217/ 103 ITR 296/ 222 TTJ 679/ 224 DTR 133 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 92CA : Transfer pricing-Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Arm’s Length price-Avoidance of tax-Order of Transfer Pricing Officer-Limitation-Period of sixty days to be counted from day prior to date on which period of limitation for assessment expires-Order barred by imitation by one day-Order non est-Assessee ceases to be eligible assessee-Draft assessment order and assessment order void ab initio.[S. 144C, 153]

Jet Airways (India) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 147 taxmann.com 540/ 103 ITR 323 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 92CA : Transfer pricing-Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Arm’s Length price-Avoidance of tax-Survey-Notices issued to assessee calling for evidence and explanation with respect to Transfer Pricing Adjustment Proposed By Transfer Pricing Officer-Failure to furnish details bbefore Assessing Officer-Failure by Assessee to comply with notices issued in spite of several opportunities-Opportunity may be provided to assessee to present its case before Assessing Officer-Assessee to pay cost Rs. 25,000 in each appeal. [S. 92CA (3), 133A, 142(1), 144C]

Yanfeng India Automotive Interior Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. JCIT (OSD) (2023) 148 taxmann.com 332/ 101 ITR 78 (SN)/ 222 TTJ 3 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 92CA : Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Arm’s Length Price-Payment to associated enterprise for services rendered-TPO cannot question necessity of expenses occurred-Assessee liable to prove that actual services rendered-Assessee failed to prove-no evidence or documentation or agreement between assessee and associated enterprise-No infirmity in the order of TPO-Arm’s length price-Nil.[S.92C]

Dassault Systems India P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023) 105 ITR 9 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-AO drawing an adverse inference without providing an opportunity to explain the working of allocation is in violation of principals of natural justice. [S. 144C]

SS Oral Hygiene Products P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)103 ITR 691 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Payment made to non-resident for maintenance of a project under a service agreement-recomputation of Arm’s length price-held, claim by the assessee genuine as no such computation was done for previous years.

DCIT v. H.K Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 103 ITR 12 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-When assessee was able to prove the difference in price was due to quality of products sold, no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted.[S. 92CA]

Louis Dreyfus Company India (P.) Ltd v. DCIT (2023) 103 ITR 6 (SN)/ 222 TTJ 868/ 224 DTR 81 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Prices of comparable products on their respective invoice/shipment date as considered in customs valuation would yield a more reliable result in absence of any differences arising out of contract terms and product quality.[S.92CA]

Mitsui Prime Advanced Composites India P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2023) 103 ITR 35 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Adhoc addition made by the Transfer Pricing Officer on account of ‘Price Penetration Adjustment’ by the assessee, treating the same as income is without jurisdiction.[S. 92, 92CA]

KHS Machinery (P.) Ltd v. DCIT (2023) 103 ITR 72 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-(i) Insurance claim and foreign exchange fluctuation gain related to raw material consumed by assessee in operation of business is to be added to operating revenue of assessee to arrive at ALP of international transaction. (ii) Adjustment of PLI of comparables should be made at transaction level and not entity level. [S.92CA]