Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Johnson & Johanson (P) Ltd v. Dy.CIT(2023) 225 TTJ 241// (2024)112 ITR 259 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Order is barred by limitation.[ S.92CA (3A), 143(3) 153]

Star India (P) Ltd v. ACIT(2023) 224 TTJ 985 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Return-Refund-Amalgamation-Non-existent entity-Credit for taxes paid-Assessing Officer is bound to give credit of taxes paid under section 199 and allow refund of tax in accordance with law. [ S.139, 139(9) 199, 237]

Urvashi Narain v. ITO (2023) 225 TTJ 131/ 156 taxmann.com 189 / (2024) 110 ITR 670 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Final assessment order is passed-Assessing Officer had no powers to either withdraw or modify or substitute assessment order passed under section 143(3) with another assessment order. [ S. 144C]

Sukhdham Infrastructures LLP v. ITO (2024) 165 taxmann.com 154 / 226 TTJ 497 //(2024) 208 ITD 141 (Kol) (Kol)(Trib.)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Limited scrutiny-Unsecured loan-Notice beyond scope of limited scrutiny-CBDT Instruction No. 5/2016, dated 14-7-2016-Assessment is bad in law. [ S. 36(1)(iii), 37(1), 68, 119]

Bangalore Narayan Das v. ITO (IT) (2023) 157 taxmann.com 605 / 226 TTJ 66 (Bang)(Trib.)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Document Identification Number (DIN)-Assessment order without obtaining Document Identification Number (DIN) is invalid-No jurisdiction-Order passed without issuing the notice u/s 143(2)-Order is quashed.[ S.143(2), 144, 147]

Dy.CIT v. Shan Lal Arora (2023) 225 TTJ 289 (Chd)(Trib) Rajiv Kumar v. ACIT (2023) 225 TTJ 289 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 142(2A) : Inquiry before assessment-Special audit-Additional ground is admitted-Order is barred by limitation.[ S. 153B, 254(1)

TPG Growth II Market PTE Ltd. v. Dy. CIT(2023) 224 TTJ 789 /153 taxmann.com 368 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Purchase of shares from Associated Enterprise-DCF method-Adjustment is deleted-Transactions under taken by the promoters / share holders of the company-Sale of shares using CUP method-Gap of three months-Matter remanded to the TPO.[ R. 10B(5)]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 154 taxmann.com 372 / 226 TTJ 361 (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax- International transaction-Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM)-Tested party-Loan to Associated enterprise-Adjustment of interest-Matter remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after granting due opportunity of being heard.

Tata Chemicals Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023) 155 taxmann.com 461/ 226 TTJ 973 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax- International transaction-Sale of electricity from its Power Plant unit to its manufacturing unit-Per unit electricity sold to non-eligible unit at Rs. 6.90 per unit was market value, assessee is justified in adopting ALP of electricity supply to its AEs at rate charged by Gujarat Electricity Board (GEB). [ 80IA(8),92F(ii)]

Worship Infraprojects (P) Ltd v. Dy.CIT(2023) 226 TTJ 649 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 92BA : Transfer pricing-Specified domestic transaction-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-Omitted with effect from Ist April 2017-No saving clause-Order is bad in law.