Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Geecee Ventures Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 371 / 174 taxmann.com 1285 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S.14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Only investments yielding exempt income to be considered-Amendment by Finance Act, 2022 prospective. [R. 8D]

Dy. CIT v. Bodal Chemicals Ltd. (2025) 127 ITR 194 / 177 taxmann.com 448 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 14A: Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Own funds exceeding investments-No disallowance of interest warranted. [R. 8D]

Manipal Education and Medical Group India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 623 / 181 taxmann.com 711 (Bang.)(Trib.) Manipal Global Education Services P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 623 / 181 taxmann.com 711 (Bang.)(Trib.) Manipal Hospital P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 623 / 181 taxmann.com 711 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 14A: Disallowance-Recording of satisfaction mandatory-Rule 8D cannot be invoked without examining accounts. [S 10(35), 115JB, R. 8D]

Gospel India Ministries v. CIT (E) (2025) 127 ITR 296 (Nagpur)(Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Charitable trust-Final registration-Rejection on technical ground not justified.
[S. 11, 12, 12A(1)(ac)(vi)]

Sterling Holiday Resorts Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 284 / 180 taxmann.com 310 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 4: Charge of income-tax-Income-Time-share membership fees-Consistent method of recognising income over membership period-Entire receipts not taxable in year of receipt.[S. 145]

Arati Saraf v. Jt. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 337 (Cuttack)(Trib.)

S.271D: Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Receipt of entire sale consideration in cash at the time of execution and registration of sale deed does not violate section 269SS, as the expression “specified sum” applies only to advances received in relation to transfer of immovable property. [S. 269SS, 271D, 274]

Harmony Yarns P. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 478 (Surat)(Trib.)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-
-Assessment was completed after duly examining the issue of unsecured loan-Invocation of revision jurisdiction to verify the same issue is not permissible.[S.36(1)(va), 143(3)]

Asst. CIT v. Kerry Indev Logistics P. Ltd (2025) 131 ITR 100 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 255: Appellate Tribunal-Procedure-Functions-Right to Information Act-Departmental representative seeking disqualification of assessee’s advocate on ground that advocate represented Tribunal Member as CPIO in an unrelated RTI matter-No conflict of interest-Tribunal not appropriate forum to adjudicate disciplinary matter-Ministry of Law and Justice not having control over judicial functions of Tribunal-Application frivolous, amounting to obstruction of justice-Rejected. [S. 254(1), Art. 227]

K.K. Leissure Tourism International P. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 131 ITR 226 (Cochin) (Trib)

S. 153C: Search and seizure-Assessment of third person-Satisfaction note-Must state with reference to information from seized material its relevance to assessee’s income-Assessee’s business not commenced-No question of turnover being suppressed-Seized documents bearing no reference to turnover-Satisfaction note issued without application of mind-Approval under section 153D also invalid-Assessments not sustainable. [S. 69C, 153A, 153D]

ITO v. Ravjibhai Bechabhai Dhameliya (2025) 131 ITR 557 (Surat)(Trib.)

S. 151: Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Within four years-Non-application of mind-Approval granted by the specified authority is not in accordance with the law-The notice for reopening and the subsequent assessment order is bad in law [S. 147, 148]