Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (IT) [2024] 168 taxmann.com 269 / (2025) 233 TTJ 83 (Mum)(Trib)

115JB : Company-Book profit-Income from operation of ships-Income offered income under deeming provision-Provsion of book profit is not applicable-DTAA-India Hing Kong. [S. 44B, 90(2), Art. 8]

Akshay Nitin Malu v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 491 / 245 DTR 353 / 173 taxmann.com 684 (Pune)(Trib)

S.115BAC:Tax on income of individuals and Hindu undivided family-Option-Form No 10E-New regime and old regime-The assessee cannot be forced to adopt the new regime-The action of the CPC in processing the return of income determining the total income under the new regime of taxation is quashed and set aside.[S. 139, Form No.10E]

Biocon Biologicals Ltd v. ACIT (2025)233 TTJ 930 / 170 taxmann.com 372 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Interest on outstanding receivables from AES-Outstanding dues beyond an agreed credit period are separate international transaction, which requires to be benchmarked separately and cannot be clubbed together with other transactions-Working capital adjustment subsumed accrued interest on trade receivables, and no separate adjustment should be made was not advanced before the TPO or the DRP-, Issue is restored back to the TPO.[R. 10A]

Pushpadevi Shivlal Rathi v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 12 / 245 DTR 16 (SMC) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Income Declaration Scheme, 2016-quoted wrong PAN No.-issue is restored to the AO for necessary verification. [Income Declaration Scheme, 2016]

Asha Daga v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 860/ 170 taxmann.com 199 (Raipur)(Trib)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Jewellley-Banl locker-Old jewellery was converted in to bullion-Addition is justified. [S. 132, 153A]

Bhupatbhai Thakarshibhai Mavani v. ACIT (2025) 233 TTJ 29 (UO) (Surat) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Repayment of loan-Addition is deleted-Loan outstanding-Report of the Inspector is not provided to the assessee-Violation of principle of natural justice-The matter is restored to the AO to provide the report of the Inspector to the assessee for his rebuttal with proper and supporting evidences.[S. 133(6)]

Sopan Bandoba Chavan v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 17 (UO) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Survey-Disclosure of additional income as business income-Surrendered income cannot be assesses as cash credit and invoking the provision of section 115BBE of the Act. [S. 115BBE, 133A]

SPL Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. ITO [2024] 169 taxmann.com 459/ (2025) 233 TTJ 495 / 245 DTR 321 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Issue of shares at premium-Merchant banker on the basis of DCF method-No valuation by DCF method at the time of issuance of shares-Valuation report was obtained in the course of assessment proceedings-The AO is justified in determining the fair market value of shares by applying R. 11UA(2) and making addition by invoking section 56(2)(vib) of the Act. [S. 56(2)(vib), R.11UA(2)]

Zahid Hasan Khan v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 229 / 245 DTR 268 / 173 taxmann.com 191 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 54B : Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-Agricultural land purchased in the name of wife-Not entitle for exemption. [S.45]

Zahid Hasan Khan v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 229 / 245 DTR 268 / 173 taxmann.com 191 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Cost of acquisition-Fair market value of land as on 1st April, 1981-Sale transaction through open auction in nearby Village Bhatauli, where the Ministry of Defence, Government of India purchased land on 3rd Nov., 1981 would be a better determinant of the fair market value of the land that was sold by the assessee-AO is directed to adopt the said value of the land for the purposes of determining the cost of acquisition and resultant indexed cost of acquisition while computing the capital gains in the hands of the assessee-[S.2(14), 45, 55(2)(b)]