Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 507 / 175 taxmann.com 427 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i); Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Business expenditure-Reinsurance premium paid to non-resident reinsurers-Not chargeable to tax in India-No liability to deduct tax at source. [S. 195]

Asst. CIT v. Shrigopal Rameshkumar Sales (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 1 (Nagpur)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Personal expenses of directors-No evidence that expenditure belonged to assessee-Addition deleted.

Dy. CIT v. Piramal Estates (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 488 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Advertisement and sales promotion expenses-Real estate project undertaken on ownership basis-Revenue expenditure allowable.

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 507 / 175 taxmann.com 427 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Commission to motor vehicle dealers-Genuine business services established-Disallowance deleted-IBNR and IBNER provisions-Ascertained liabilities based on actuarial valuation-Deduction allowable.

SIEL Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (LTU) (2025) 123 ITR 599 / 173 taxmann.com 278 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Staff welfare expenses-Ad hoc disallowance without identifying non-business expenditure-Deletion justified.

Norben Tea and Exports Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 715 / 175 taxmann.com 237 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Prior period expenses-Provision for gratuity already disallowed by assessee-Double disallowance not permissible-Matter restored.[S. 145]

Norben Tea and Exports Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 715 / 175 taxmann.com 237 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(va) : Any sum received from employees-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Deposit beyond due date-Disallowance forms part of business income and not income from other sources-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Deduction not allowable under general provision of section 37(1).[S.2(24)(x), 37(1)]

SIEL Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (LTU) (2025) 123 ITR 599 / 173 taxmann.com 278 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Business expenditure-Loans to sister concerns-Consistent view in earlier years-Disallowance deleted.[S. 37(1)]

ITO v. Harmony Vinimay (P.) Ltd. (2025) 123 ITR 458 / 174 taxmann.com 1239 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Business expenditure-Interest-free advances to land co-owners-Advances towards co-owners’ share of project consideration-Disallowance deleted. [S.37(1)]

Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 123 ITR 507 / 175 taxmann.com 427 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 32: Depreciation-Computer accessories-Uninterrupted Power System eligible for 60 per cent. depreciation-Projector not part of computer system-Computer software-Tangible asset-Eligible for depreciation at 60 per cent.