S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Exemption under section 11 denied due to inadvertent and bona fide punching errors in the return processed under section 143(1)-Assessee has the discretion to seek revision instead of appeal-Commissioner obliged to consider and grant relief even for an error committed by the assessee itself. [S. 11, 143(1), 154, 246A, Art. 226]

S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Tax on long-term capital gains-Precedent-Principal Commissioner was bound to follow such decision and could not deviate on the ground of departmental non-acceptance-Revision order was unsustainable and set aside. [S. 45, 50, 112, Art . 226]

S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Defective return-A declaration given under section 139(9) is clearly an order that is revisable under section 264. The order of rejection by the Commissioner was set aside. [S. 44AB,139(9) Art. 226]

S. 245D: Settlement Commission-Procedure-Rectification-Final order charging interest under section 234B only till the date of intimation under section 143(1)-Assessee paid the dues, and proceedings concluded-Commission has no power to invoke section 154 to levy additional interest till the date of the final order-Rectification order quashed. [S. 143(1), 154, 234B, 245D(4), Art. 226]

S. 245: Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Conditional stay-Tribunal granted conditional stay allowing adjustment of only 20 per cent of demand out of refund, but respondents adjusted entire refund in violation of operative stay order, such action was illegal, and failure of Tribunal to direct refund of excess amount with interest was erroneous, necessitating setting aside impugned order to this extent and directing refund of excess amount with interest as per law.[S. 254(1), Art. 226]

S. 244A: Refunds-Interest on delayed payment of TDS-Date of tendering cheque to authorised bank constitutes date of payment-Rigidities of online portal cannot deny substantive justice-Refund with interest ordered. [S. 201, 220, Art. 226]

S. 226: Collection and recovery of tax-Spouse-Other modes of recovery-Mere spouse of a director does not create liability for the company’s tax dues; hence, attachment of the spouse’s bank account under section 226(3) is without jurisdiction and invalid. The order was quashed and set aside. [S. 226(3), 179, Art. 226]

S. 220: Collection and recovery of tax-Stay of demand-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-CBDT Office Memorandums do not mandate a rigid pre-deposit of 20%-Assessing Officers must judicially exercise discretion based on prima facie merits, financial hardship, and potential hardship-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 220(6), 250, Art. 226]

S. 220: Collection and recovery of tax-Stay-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Refund-Recovery during pendency of appeal before First Appellate Authority cannot exceed 20 per cent of disputed demand without explicit approval of Principal Commissioner-Adjustment of refund in excess of 20% held contrary to CBDT instructions-Directed to refund the amount. [S. 220(6), 250, 270A, Art. 226]

S. 220: Collection and recovery of tax-Stay-Adjustment of refund-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Refund cannot be adjusted against a demand stayed under section 220(6); once the assessee is treated as not in default, such recovery is impermissible-Directed to refund the amount. [S. 220(6), 245, Art. 226]