Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sprite Investment (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 300 Taxman 526 /(2025) 473 ITR 342(Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Jurisdiction-Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)-Re-assessment proceedings initiated without conducting faceless assessment as envisaged under section 144B-Contrary to provision of law-Notice and order is quashed.[S.119,120, 144B(7), 144B(8), 148, 1488A(b), 148A(d)),151A, Art.226]

Royal Bitumen (P.) Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 139 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Jurisdiction-Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)-Re-assessment proceedings initiated without conducting faceless assessment as envisaged under section 144B-Contrary to provision of law-Notice and order is quashed.[S.119,120, 144B(7), 144B(8), 148, 1488A(b), 148A(d)),151A, Art.226]

Mettler Toledo India (P.) Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 394 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Jurisdiction-Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)-Re-assessment proceedings initiated without conducting faceless assessment as envisaged under section 144B-Contrary to provision of law-Notice and order is quashed.[S.119,120, 144B(7), 144B(8), 148, 1488A(b), 148A(d)),151A, Art.226]

Govind Singh v. ITO (2024) 300 Taxman 216 (HP)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Jurisdiction-Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)-Re-assessment proceedings initiated without conducting faceless assessment as envisaged under section 144B-Contrary to provision of law-Interim stay is granted. [S.119,120, 144B(7), 144B(8),,148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 151, Art.226]

Sandeep Kumar Gupta v. UOI (2024) 300 Taxman 386 (P&H)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Jurisdiction-Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)-Re-assessment proceedings initiated without conducting faceless assessment as envisaged under section 144B-Contrary to provision of law-Notice and order is quashed.[S.119,120, 144B(7), 144B(8), 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 151, Art.226]

Genpact Luxembourg S.A.R.L v. ACIT (2024) 300 Taxman 462 /(2025) 473 ITR 68/343 CTR 485 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Interest on bonds/Debentures-Interest income received on NCDs is in nature of dividend-liable to be taxed in terms of section 115-O-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed-DTAA-India-Luxemborg [S.9(1)(v), 115-O, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 194LD, Art. 11, Art. 226.]

CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd (2023) 153 taxmann.com 641/(2024) 471 ITR 470 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Delay of 213 days, SLP of Revenue is dismissed as the delay is not satisfactorily explained, CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 102 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Cash credits-Shell Companies-Information from Investigation Wing-Recorded reason mechanical manner without application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Mistake-A mistake, which can be corrected under section 292B, should be such that if excised it does not change tenor and scope of documents/proceedings referred to therein-Order of Tribunal quashing the reassessment order is affirmed-No substantial question of law.[S. 68, 143(1), 148, 260A, 292B]

PCIT v. Samsung India Electronics (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 21/(2025) 475 ITR 70 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained expenditure-Prior period items and advertisement expenses-No new tangible material-Quashing of reassessment by the Tribunal is affirmed. [S.69C, 148, 260A]

Facets Gems Polishing Works (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 168/ 471 ITR 674 (Guj.)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Manufacturing and cut of polished diamond on job work basis and trading of diamonds and power generation through windmill-Amalgamation-No failure to disclose material facts-reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S.80IA(4)(iv) 143(3), 148, Form No.10CCB, Art. 226]

Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel v. ITO (2023) 151 taxmann.com 121/ 417 ITR 216 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, ITO v. Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel (2024) 300 Taxman 96 / 471 ITR 227 (SC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 48, 148, Art. 226]