Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Jayshri Propack (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 198 ITD 17 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Shares issued at premium-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to consider the valuation report submitted by the assessee. [S. 56(2)(viib) R.11U, 11UA]

Anant R Gawande. v. ACIT (2023) 198 ITD 58 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Two residential house-One unit co-owned by assessee and wife-Ownership of more than one house-Not absolute owner-Denial of exemption is not valid-Under construction house-Income cannot be assessed as income from house property-Till time of possession condition stipulated in clause (b) of proviso to section 54F(1) was not satisfied-Denial of exemption is not valid. [S. 22, 45]

ACIT v. Mayur Batra. (2023) 198 ITD 333 / 222 TTJ 526(Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-claim of benefit could not be disallowed only on ground that same was not claimed in return-Commissioner (Appeals) have powers to consider claim of assessee which was left half way by Assessing Officer.[S. 139, 251]

ITO v. Vinod Gugnani. (2023) 198 ITD 233 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Invested entire amount of sale consideration towards construction of new house-Delay of 31 days in depositing the amount in capital gains account-Denial of exemption is not justified. [S. 45, 139(1)]

Dr. Dharmista Mehta. v. ITO (2023) 198 ITD 106 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Purchase or construction-Exemption should be allowed if amount is invested on or before due date of filing of return under section 139(4).[S.45,54(2), 139(1),139(4)]

Dr. Sheela Puttabuddi. v. ITO (2023) 198 ITD 48/223 TTJ 499 s (Bang) (Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Purchase-Agricultural land which was to be converted into non-agricultural property-Amount paid to builder before filing of return-House is registered beyond prescribed period-Eligible to claim exemption. [S. 45]

Rangnathappa Govindappa Zharkhande v. ITO (2023) 198 ITD 290 / 225 TTJ 621 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 45(2) : Capital gains-Conversion of a capital asset in to stock-in-trade-Long term capital gains at FMV computed by indexation of Stamp Duty Valuation as on date of sale, rather than entire sale consideration is justified-Jurisdiction of Commissioner (Appeals) does not extend to introducing an altogether new source of income.[S. 28(i), 45, 251]

Biplab Adhya. v. ITO (2023) 198 ITD 643 (Bang) (Trib.)

S. 45: Capital gains-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Capital gains-Non-Resident-Cost of acquisition-Short term capital loss-TRC produced-Matter remanded to the file of Assessing Officer-DTAA-India-USA.[S. 9(1)(i), Art. 13]

Sujan Azad Parikh. v. DCIT (2023) 198 ITD 83 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Family arrangement-Transfer of shares under family arrangement-Transfer of shares as per direction of Company Law Board (CLB )-Not transfer-Not liable to capital gains tax.[S. 2(47)]

DCIT v. Srinivasan Devendran. (2023) 198 ITD 495 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 44AD :Presumptive basis-Civil contractor-State Public Works Department relating to road construction-Estimate of net profit at 4 percent on turnover basis is affirmed.[S. 44AB, 144]