Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


V.S. Finance Ltd. v. CCIT (2024) 340 CTR 106 / 240 DTR 346 (All) (HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Natural justice-Order passed next day-Rules of natural justice are found completely broken-Order is quashed and set aside-AO is directed to pass the order after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. [S. 142(1), O 148, 148A(b)I, 148A((d), Art. 226]

Rahul Rajendra Adhikari v. ITO (2024) 340 CTR 598 / 241 DTR 469 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice in the name of deceased-Non application of mind by the Assessing Officer and sanctioning authority-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 151, Art. 226]

Kairos Properties (P) Ltd. v.ACIT (2024) 340 CTR 690/ 241 DTR 97 /468 ITR 168 /165 Taxmann.com 760 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Order by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and not by a Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), as required by provisions of section 151A,-Notice under sections 148A(b)/148 was not sustainable and was liable to be set aside.[S.148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 151A(2), Art. 226]

Benaifer Vispi Patel v. ITO (2024) 340 CTR 581 / 241 DTR 209 / 300 Taxman 248/(2025) 475 ITR 704 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Interest income-Any information-It is incumbent on the AO to apply his mind to all such materials-Any information which is derived from S. 135A would be sacrosanct and/or would be free of defects-Interest income received from the bank-Notice issued is arbitrary and vitiated by non application of mind hence quashed. [S. 135A,143(1), 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 14,19(1)(g), 226, 265, 300A]

Associated Chambers of Commerce & Industry of India v. DCIT (2024) 340 CTR 241 / 241 DTR 49 / 300 Taxman 410 / (2025) 473 ITR 696 (Delhi)(HC) (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Charitable trust-Accumulation of income-Delay in filing Form No.10 and Form No. 10B-The action for reassess is not founded on income liable to tax having escaped assessment-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S.11(2), 11(5),148A(b), 148A(d), Form No 10, 10B. Art. 226]

UOI v. Rajeev Bansal (2024) 340 CTR 865 / 242 DTR 297 / 301 Taxman 238 / 167 Taxmann.com 70/469 ITR 46 (SC) Editorial : Rajeev Bansal v UOI (2023) 453 ITR 153/ 147 taxmann.com 541/ 331 CTR 609/ 223 DTR 177 (All)(HC), Keenara Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 147 taxxmann.com 585 453 ITR 51 (Guj)(HC) [2023], J M Financial and Investment Consultancy Services (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2023] 451 ITR 205 (Bom.); Siemens Financial Services (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 154 taxmann.com 159 / 457 ITR 51 (Guj)(HC), Geeta Agarwal Wife of Shri Navratan Agarwal v. ITO [2022] 456 ITR 103 (Raj.)(HC) Ambika Iron and Steel (P.) Ltd. v. Pr. CIT [2022] 452 ITR 285 (Orissa)(HC) Twylight Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 158 taxmann.com 378 (Delhi) (HC) and Ganesh Dass Khanna v. ITO (2023) 156 taxmann.com 417 /460 ITR 546 (Delhi)(HC) is set aside with observations.

S. 148A: Reassessment-Limitation–Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-TOLA overrides Income-tax Act to extent of relaxing time limit for issue of reassessment notice which fell for completion from 20-3-2020 to 31-3-2021, till 30-6-2021-Section 3(1) of TOLA relaxes time limit for compliance with actions that fall for completion from 20 March 2020 to 31 March 2021 and TOLA will accordingly extend time limit for grant of sanction by authority specified under section 151-Entire time allowed to assessee to respond to show cause notice has to be excluded for computing period of limitation and thus, period from date of issuance of deemed notices till supply of relevant information and material by Assessing Officers to assessees in terms of directions issued by this Court in UOI v. Ashish Agarwal (2022) 286 Taxman 183/ 444 ITR 1 (SC) has to be excluded from computation of period of limitation-In case of section 151 of new regime if time limit of three years from end of an assessment year falls between 20 March 2020 and 31 March 2021, then specified authority under section 151(i) has an extended time till 30 June 2021 to grant approval-In case of section 151 of old regime, if time limit of four years from end of an assessment year falls between 20 March 2020 and 31 March 2021, then specified authority under section 151(2) has time till 31 March 2021 to grant approval..[S. 148, 149(1)(b), 151, Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3(1)]

Dy. CIT v. Surendra Kumar Jain (Dead) through legal heirs (2024) 340 CTR 536 / 241 DTR 385 / 164 Taxmann.com 575 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Directions of higher authorities-Evident from record that Assessing Officer had passed order for reassessment under influence of his superiors-Reassessment is rightly quashed by the Tribunal. [S. 68, 132(9A),132A, 148 260A]

Aldrin Alberto Araujo Soares v. DCIT (2024) 340 CTR 99 / 239 DTR 305 / 162 Taxmann.com 186 (Bom)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Transfer pricing-Draft assessment order-Eligible assessee-No estoppel against the law-AO have to assess the original return in terms of S. 143(1) or other relevant provisions of the IT Act and make an appropriate assessment order-Order is set aside. [S.143(1), 144C(15)(b), Art. 226]

Reshi Construction Company v. CIT (2024) 340 CTR 513 / 241 DTR 361 / 167 Taxmann.com 47 (J&K)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Undisclosed income-Machinery shown in the balance sheet-Failure to explain the source of investment-Addition as undisclosed income is held to be justified. [S.69, 119, 143(2), 260A]

Sayed Muhammed M. v. CIT (A) (2024) 340 CTR 511 / 237 DTR 540 (Ker)(HC) Editorial : Sayed Muhammed M. v. CIT (A) (2024) 339 CTR 230 / 237 DTR 542 (Ker)(HC), affirmed.

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Alternative remedy-Writ-Disputed question of fact cannot be adjudicated in writ petition-Remedy open to the assessee is to approach the appellate forum-Order of single judge dismissing the writ is affirmed. [S. 250, 154(1) Art. 226]