Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. R. K. Jain Infra Projects (P.) Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 369 /464 ITR 584 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. R. K. Jain Infra Projects (P.) Ltd(2023) 293 Taxman 465 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Business expenditure-Specific query was raised in the original assessment proceedings-Mere failure to issue notice under section 133(6) did not warrant exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 37(1), 133(6), 143(3), Art. 136]

CIT (IT) v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. (2024) 297 Taxman 371/463 ITR 63 /337 CTR 1 (SC) Editorial : CIT (IT) v. Bharti Airtel Ltd (2024) 159 taxmann.com 315 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay 4 years and 100 days-Failed to give any adequate or sufficient reasons-Appeal was dismissed as time barred-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [Art. 136]

Coda Global LLC v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024) 297 Taxman 299/339 CTR 314 /466 ITR 687 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Central Processing Centre (CPC)-Unable to input it foreign bank account details by imputing SWIFT code and IBAN as per ITR-Bank account is validated by revenue on 7-7-2023 and refund was made in October 2023 without interest-High Court directed the Revenue to pay interest on refund amount at rate specified in section 244A from 1-5-2022 to 5-10-2023. [S. 143(1), Art. 226]

IBM India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 297 Taxman 105/338 CTR 869 (Karn)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Pendency of appeal before DRP-No recoverable demand-Refund cannot be withheld to be adjustment towards anticipated demand. [S.144C(5), 220,254(1), Art.226]

Namudha v. ITO (2024) 297 Taxman 243 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Pendency of appeal-Directed to the recovery till disposal of the appeal by the CIT(A). [S. 50C, 56(2)(x), 250, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 297 Taxman 137 /464 ITR 190/ 338 CTR 141 (SC) Editorial: Cognizant Technology Solutions India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT(2024) 158 taxmann.com 428 /338 CTR 143/464 ITR 183 (Mad)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of appeal-Direction of High Court is modified and requirement of security with respect to penalty was to be dispensed with.[S.115-O, 226, Art. 136]

CIT (TDS) v. B. Arunkunar Trading Ltd (2024) 297 Taxman 567 /465 ITR 748/339 CTR 49 (Bom)(HC)

S. 194I : Deduction at source-Rent-Storage charges-Storage tanks-Did not qualify either as land or as building-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 201(IA), (260A]

Gee Cee Metals (P.) Ltd. (AOP) v. PCIT (2024) 297 Taxman 67 (SC) Editorial : Gee Cee Metals (P.) Ltd. (AOP) v. PCIT (2023) 152 taxmann.com 331/445 ITR 211 (Uttarakhand)(HC)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Refund of tax deduction at source-Central Board of Direct Taxes-Instructions-Application was filed after 12 years from assessment year-High Court dismissed as barred by limitation-SLP dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to make an application before CBDT.[S. 119, art.136]

Shyamlal Rupchand Parwani v. ACIT (2024) 297 Taxman 581 / 337 CTR 850 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure-Satisfaction note-Served satisfaction note subsequent to notice under section 143(2)-Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 132 142(1), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Gali Janardhana Reddy (2024) 297 Taxman 62/463 ITR 697 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Gali Janardhana Reddy(2023) 152 taxmann.com 332/ 454 ITR 467 (Karn)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Satisfaction note-Limitation-Where no satisfaction is recorded year of search has to be considered-High Court quashed the proceedings-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 132, 153A]