S. 145 : Method of accounting-Builder-Rule of consistency followed-Percentage of completion method-Accounting Standard Guidance note not notified by Central Government-Assessing Officer not right in recomputing profitability of Assessee. [ S. 145(2) ]

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Limitation-Company amalgamated with assessee and ceasing to exist-Fact of amalgamation intimated to department-Order of Transfer Pricing Officer and draft assessment order issued in name of non-existing company-Invalid-Directions of Dispute Resolution Panel and final assessment passed in name of assessee-Not valid-Assessee ceasing to be eligible assessee and reduced time-limit for assessment-Assessment is barred by limitation .[ S.92CA (3)

S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Transfer pricing-Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Arm’s Length price-Avoidance of tax-Remand order-Order passed by Assessing Officer giving effect to order of Dispute Resolution Panel without understanding Tribunal’s order-Matter remanded to Assessing Officer for adjudication afresh. [S. 92CA]

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-International Transactions-Arm’s Length Price-Limitation-Period of sixty days to be counted from day prior to date on which period of limitation for assessment expires-Order barred by limitation-Order non est-Ceased to be eligible assessee-Draft assessment order, directions of Dispute Resolution Panel and final asessment order void ab initio-Tribunal has the power to admit additional ground on limitation . [ S.92CA(3) 153 , 254(1) ]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation of companies-Income taxed merely on basis of details in Form 26AS of erstwhile company-Assessing Officer is directed to adjudicate afresh after examination of details furnished by assessee and details in Form 26AS-Deduction only on actual payment-Gratuity-Allowability of gratuity restored to Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication.[S. 43B]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Jurisdiction of Authorities-Instruction of Board that non-corporate assessees in Metro cities declaring income up to Rs. 20 Lakhs to be assessed by Income-Tax Officer-Returned income of assessee Less Than Rs. 20 Lakhs-Assessment Completed By Deputy Commissioner without jurisdiction-Instruction No. 1 of 2011, Dated 31-1-2011.

S. 143(2): Assessment-Notice-Mandatory-Failure to issue notice-Assessment is null and void. [S. 143(3), 147, 148]

S. 139 : Return of income-Revised return-Once revised return is filed, Assessing Officer is not entitled to advert to original return of income-Loss-Loss to be allowed-Assessing Officer could not disturb apparent consideration by substituting agreed consideration by fair market value. [S. 2(11)32(i)(ii),43(6), 50, 72(1) 71(2), 74(1) 80, 139(3), 139(5), 143(3)]

S. 132 : Search and Seizure-Statement in the course of search-Retraction-Retraction not to be rejected as afterthought merely because filed after search, retraction is held to be valid-Warrant of authorisation-Not necessary to issue warrant of authorisation in each and every case-Search proceedings continuing for number of days and assessee required to be present throughout-Does not mean that the assessee has kept in illegal detention. [S. 132(4)]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Sale of goods to associated enterprises-Comparative-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer .