Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Li & Fung (India) P. Ltd. (2021) 130 taxmann.com 438 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue ; PCIT v. Li & Fung (India) P. Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 4 (SC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-TNM method-Transaction of buying services for sourcing garments in India-Addition made to ALP by applying cost plus 5 per cent mark-up on FOB value of exports among third parties was not supported under rule 10B(1)(e) and was liable to be deleted. [R. 10B(1)(e)]

Sudarsanan P. S. v. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 84 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Failure to explain the source-Justified in confirming the disallowance.

CIT v. Midas Golden Distilleries (P) Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 395//(2022)441 ITR 293 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application money-Shell companies-Share holders could not explain their source-Addition is held to be justified.

Caborandum Universal Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 283 Taxman 312 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Computation-Full value of consideration-Retention of money in Escrow account-Possession was handed over-Amount of money in Escrow account has to be considered while computing the capital gain for the purpose of full consideration. [S. 45]

Oil Palm India Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 208 DTR 345/(2022) 324 CTR 171 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Tax paid under Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 10(1), 37(1), Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1991]

Sudarsanan P.S. v. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 84 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Payment of freight and carriage charges for previous year 2006-07 (1-4-2006 to 31-3-2007)-Disallowance is held to be not valid-Commission payment disallowance is held to be justified. [S. 194C]

PCIT v. Gopakumaran Nair (2021) 283 Taxman 173 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Commission charges to overseas agents-Service rendered outside India-Cannot be considered as fees for technical services-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Art, 12-OECD Model convention. [S. 9(1)(vii), 195]

PCIT v. Karnataka State Co-op. Apex Bank Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 106 / (2022)441 ITR 312 (Karn) (HC) .Editorial : Order in Karnataka State Co-Operative Apex Bank Ltd. v. Dy.CIT ( 2016) 46 ITR 728 ( Bang ) ( Trib) affirmed .Editorial: Notice issued in SLP of Revenue , PCIT v. Karnataka State Co-op Apex Bank. Ltd. (2022) 287 Taxman 186 / 113 CCH 186 (SC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Statutory obligation-Contribution to common good fund-Special assistance fund-Allowable as deduction.

CIT (LTU) v. Biocon Ltd. (2021) 131 taxmann.com 187 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : Notice is issued in SLP filed by the revenue, CIT(LTU) v. Biocon Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 290 (SC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Discount on issue of ESOP-Allowable as deduction.

CIT v. Thiru Arooran Sugar Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 156 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Interest-Prepayment premium-Corporate debt restructuring-Allowable as deduction.